0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Policy & Risk Sign in to save

An EU ban on microplastics in cosmetic products and the right to regulate

Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law 2018 103 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Esther Kentin Esther Kentin Esther Kentin Esther Kentin Esther Kentin Heidi Kaarto, Esther Kentin

Summary

This study examined the legal implications of the EU restriction procedure on microplastics in cosmetic products under REACH regulation, analyzing how the European Commission balanced the precautionary principle, scientific uncertainty, and member states' rights to regulate in this policy process.

Abstract In January 2018, the European Commission initiated a restriction procedure on microplastics in cosmetic products. This article deals with the legal implications of a European Union ( EU ) restriction under the Regulation on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals ( REACH ) in relation to the right to regulate in the EU and in the context of the World Trade Organization ( WTO ). The article argues that in the aftermath of harmonization, the legal scope for EU Member States is dependent on the definition that will be adopted as regards microplastics under REACH : the wider the scope of the restriction, the more probable it is that Member States’ action is restrained. In the context of WTO rules, similar considerations apply as regards the scope of the definition: the wider the scope of an EU ban, the more demanding it will be to satisfy the requirements under the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade. Providing scientific evidence is instrumental, as there is little room for the precautionary principle in both regimes.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper