We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
An EU ban on microplastics in cosmetic products and the right to regulate
AI summary Read the abstract
This study examined the legal implications of the EU restriction procedure on microplastics in cosmetic products under REACH regulation, analyzing how the European Commission balanced the precautionary principle, scientific uncertainty, and member states' rights to regulate in this policy process.
Abstract In January 2018, the European Commission initiated a restriction procedure on microplastics in cosmetic products. This article deals with the legal implications of a European Union ( EU ) restriction under the Regulation on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals ( REACH ) in relation to the right to regulate in the EU and in the context of the World Trade Organization ( WTO ). The article argues that in the aftermath of harmonization, the legal scope for EU Member States is dependent on the definition that will be adopted as regards microplastics under REACH : the wider the scope of the restriction, the more probable it is that Member States’ action is restrained. In the context of WTO rules, similar considerations apply as regards the scope of the definition: the wider the scope of an EU ban, the more demanding it will be to satisfy the requirements under the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade. Providing scientific evidence is instrumental, as there is little room for the precautionary principle in both regimes.
More Papers Like This
Restricting microplastics in the European Union: Process and criteria under REACH
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers analyzed the European Union's regulatory process for restricting intentionally added microplastics under the REACH chemical regulation, finding that the procedure requires extensive socio-economic justification alongside environmental and health risk assessments. The study notes that the precautionary principle plays a limited role, meaning that the less data available on a microplastic's harm, the harder it is to restrict it.
Banning Microplastics in Cosmetic Products in Europe: Legal Challenges
AI summary Read the abstract
The EU faces legal hurdles in implementing a comprehensive ban on intentionally added microplastics in cosmetic products, as some member states have already enacted national bans on rinse-off products. Harmonizing these fragmented regulations under EU law is essential to closing a significant pathway for microplastic pollution entering waterways and oceans.
Regulating primary microplastics in the European Union
AI summary Read the abstract
This paper reviews the European Union's regulatory approach to primary microplastics — plastics intentionally produced at small sizes for use in products like cosmetics and industrial applications. Researchers analyse the effectiveness of proposed restrictions and identify gaps that could limit their environmental impact.
Právní regulace nakládání s primárními mikroplasty na úrovni eu a v některých evropských zemích
AI summary Read the abstract
This legal review examines EU-level regulation of primary microplastics, comparing existing national measures in several EU member states — particularly regarding microbeads — with the proposed amendment to the REACH Regulation. The author finds significant variation in national approaches and discusses how the harmonisation regulation would change the management of primary microplastics across the EU.
Scientific Uncertainty of Marine Microplastic Pollution and the Dilemma of Future International Unified Legislation
AI summary Read the abstract
This legal analysis reviews existing microplastic bans across countries and regions, finding that most only target microbeads in cosmetics rather than addressing the full range of microplastic sources, leaving significant regulatory gaps.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.