Article
?
AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button.
Tier 2
?
Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence.
Policy & Risk
Sign in to save
Plastics, the Environment and Society: Current Consensus and Future Directions
2018
7 citations
?
Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Score: 30
?
0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Sabine Pahl,
Sabine Pahl,
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Sabine Pahl,
Sabine Pahl,
Richard C. Thompson
Sabine Pahl,
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Sabine Pahl,
Sabine Pahl,
Sabine Pahl,
Sabine Pahl,
Sabine Pahl,
Sabine Pahl,
Sabine Pahl,
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Sabine Pahl,
Richard C. Thompson
Sabine Pahl,
Sabine Pahl,
Sabine Pahl,
Sabine Pahl,
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Sabine Pahl,
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Sabine Pahl,
Sabine Pahl,
Richard C. Thompson
Sabine Pahl,
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Sabine Pahl,
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Sabine Pahl,
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Sabine Pahl,
Richard C. Thompson
Sabine Pahl,
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Sabine Pahl,
Richard C. Thompson
Sabine Pahl,
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Sabine Pahl,
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Sabine Pahl,
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Sabine Pahl,
Richard C. Thompson
Sabine Pahl,
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Sabine Pahl,
Richard C. Thompson
Sabine Pahl,
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Sabine Pahl,
Sabine Pahl,
Richard C. Thompson
Richard C. Thompson
Summary
This concluding chapter to a book on plastics, the environment, and society summarizes current understanding of the benefits and harms of plastic use and looks toward future research priorities. It acknowledges that while plastics bring societal benefits, their persistence as microplastics in the environment requires urgent attention.
In less than 60 years, plastics have transformed our daily lives. Usage is increasing and now exceeds 330 million tonnes per annum. In this concluding chapter we summarise current understanding about the benefits and concerns of plastics usage and look to future priorities, challenges and opportunities. It is clear that plastics bring many societal benefits and offer the potential for further advances in medical and technological applications, as well as carbon reductions. However, it is also widely acknowledged that current production, use and disposal of plastics is not sustainable. Our understanding of the issues associated with end of life plastics has increased considerably over the last decade. It is now clear that plastic debris has accumulated on a global scale and is present in considerable quantities even in remote locations such as the arctic and deep sea. Plastic debris is frequently encountered by wildlife, often with harmful if not fatal consequences. There are emerging concerns about the impacts of nanosized plastic fragments and preliminary evidence that large items of litter can have negative consequences for human wellbeing. Public and policy interest in the topic is unprecedented and funding is being made available to address the issue. However, while the suite of potential solutions is well recognised, there is no one size fits all solution. In the current thirst for action, a major challenge is matching the most appropriate solutions to particular aspects of the problem. In addition, we need to consider the role of society and the processes of social perception and influence amongst a range of actors. This is critical because, unless the efficacy of solutions is properly evidenced and understood, there is a significant risk that interventions taken in haste will not be socially acceptable and/or may lead to unintended negative consequences.