We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Quantification is more than counting: Actions required to accurately quantify and report isolated marine microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
This study developed standardized guidelines for quantifying microplastics collected by neuston nets in the ocean, identifying key sources of error in current practices. Standardized quantification methods are essential for generating data that can be reliably compared across different research groups.
Research on marine microplastics continues to increase in popularity, with a large number of studies being published every year. However, with this plethora of research comes the need for a standardised approach to quantification and analysis procedures in order to produce comparative assessments. Using data collected from neuston nets in 2016, parameters for quantifying microplastics were compared. Surface area was the most accurate parameter to describe plastic size and should be used to describe plastic quantity (per km2 or m3), alongside abundance. Of the two most commonly used methods for calculating plastic concentration (flowmeter and ship's log), ship's log provided consistently smaller abundances, with the exception of one sample, calling for a standardisation in the techniques and measurements used to quantify floating microplastics.
More Papers Like This
Methods for sampling, processing, identification,and quantification of microplastics in the marine environment
AI summary Read the abstract
This paper reviews and compares the various methods used to collect, process, identify, and quantify microplastics across different environmental samples. It highlights the lack of standardized protocols as a major obstacle to comparing results across studies and calls for methodological harmonization.
Quantification of microplastics: Which parameters are essential for a reliable inter-study comparison?
AI summary Read the abstract
Inconsistent measurement methods make it very difficult to compare microplastic data across studies. This paper proposes standardized guidelines for quantifying microplastic size and shape distributions, which would allow scientists to better track pollution levels over time and across locations.
A critical view on microplastic quantification in aquatic organisms
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers critically reviewed the methods used to quantify microplastics in aquatic organisms including zooplankton, bivalves, and fish. The study highlights that no standardized methodology exists for measuring microplastic contamination in biota, which makes comparing results across studies difficult and underscores the need for consistent analytical protocols.
Coverage of microplastic data underreporting and progress toward standardization
AI summary Read the abstract
This study synthesizes factors contributing to microplastic data underreporting, revealing that inconsistent extraction and analysis methods across studies lead to considerable underestimation of actual microplastic concentrations in the environment.
A Basis for Standardization: Optimizing Sampling Methods and Quantities for Accurate Microplastic Assessment in a Marine Environment
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists studied the best ways to find and count tiny plastic pieces (microplastics) in ocean water and beach sand, since these plastics can harm sea life and potentially affect the food we eat from the ocean. They found that researchers need to collect at least 30 grams of sand and 10 liters of water to get accurate counts of how much plastic pollution is really there. Getting these measurements right is important because it helps us understand how much plastic pollution is entering our food chain through seafood.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.