0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Quantification is more than counting: Actions required to accurately quantify and report isolated marine microplastics

Marine Pollution Bulletin 2018 44 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Molly L. Rivers, Claire Gwinnett, Lucy C. Woodall Lucy C. Woodall Claire Gwinnett, Claire Gwinnett, Claire Gwinnett, Molly L. Rivers, Lucy C. Woodall Claire Gwinnett, Lucy C. Woodall Lucy C. Woodall Claire Gwinnett, Claire Gwinnett, Lucy C. Woodall Claire Gwinnett, Claire Gwinnett, Claire Gwinnett, Claire Gwinnett, Lucy C. Woodall Claire Gwinnett, Claire Gwinnett, Claire Gwinnett, Claire Gwinnett, Claire Gwinnett, Lucy C. Woodall Claire Gwinnett, Claire Gwinnett, Claire Gwinnett, Lucy C. Woodall Lucy C. Woodall Claire Gwinnett, Lucy C. Woodall Lucy C. Woodall Lucy C. Woodall Lucy C. Woodall Lucy C. Woodall Lucy C. Woodall

Summary

This study developed standardized guidelines for quantifying microplastics collected by neuston nets in the ocean, identifying key sources of error in current practices. Standardized quantification methods are essential for generating data that can be reliably compared across different research groups.

Research on marine microplastics continues to increase in popularity, with a large number of studies being published every year. However, with this plethora of research comes the need for a standardised approach to quantification and analysis procedures in order to produce comparative assessments. Using data collected from neuston nets in 2016, parameters for quantifying microplastics were compared. Surface area was the most accurate parameter to describe plastic size and should be used to describe plastic quantity (per km<sup>2</sup> or m<sup>3</sup>), alongside abundance. Of the two most commonly used methods for calculating plastic concentration (flowmeter and ship's log), ship's log provided consistently smaller abundances, with the exception of one sample, calling for a standardisation in the techniques and measurements used to quantify floating microplastics.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper