0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

What´s missing in our Environment? (2019)

Figshare 2019 Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Franz Plochberger

Summary

This reflective paper by an ecologist explores how humanity's growing technical capabilities have outpaced our ability to think ecologically and sustainably, with plastic pollution as a key example of unintended environmental consequences. It calls for a deeper integration of ecological thinking into science and decision-making.

Ecology, as science of our Environment (Old-Greek: „oikos“ = the house, „logos“ = the word, the science) is with Human Being since his first appearance. What makes us today so clairaudient or even anxious is the knowledge, that the Human Being has developed technical abilities too efficient and without thinking about evolution and resources of our Nature. The soft ability of getting Information shows certainly our errors in last decades. Fortunately, our Ecology is able to fix clear sources and creators. We realised that we have generated our Climate Crisis by our own. We know already how we can prohibit bad dangers out of our heating of our Earth Environment. Even some, artificial created new materials (f. i. Plastic) are longer usable then the evolutionally developed ones of our Nature but we can’t recycle them without problems. So „Microplastic“ makes broad pollutions in our seas. Fishes eat them and die because that’s no food for them, some eaten chemical elements may have toxic follow ups as food for Human Beings. That are – genuine journalistic-commercial – the actually most horrifying catastrophic messages. Till now Ecology can´t start effective, worldwide strategies against Climate Change. Whole our Humanity – we have to think in that dimension – will start a common strategy only the last moment. A worldwide or even regional consensus is actually starting. We are bound to our descendants. Irresponsible or single persons only don´t care about this. The Human Being is in rare cases suizidal.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

What´s missing in our environment? (2019)

This reflective essay on ecology and environmental awareness discusses what has been lost and what challenges face modern society in relating to the natural environment. It is a philosophical piece with no primary scientific data on microplastics.

Article Tier 2

Environmental issues resulting from scientific and technical progress

This article argues that unrestrained technological and scientific progress has created global environmental crises that now threaten life on Earth, emphasizing the urgency of rethinking humanity's relationship with nature. Plastic pollution and microplastics are among the key environmental consequences discussed.

Article Tier 2

From the Ecological Crisis of the Anthropocene to the Ecological Transition

This philosophical and scientific paper frames the current environmental crisis as an Anthropocene crisis involving not just climate change but the destabilization of the entire Earth system, including plastic pollution and biodiversity loss. The author argues that ecological transition requires systemic change in human-nature relationships.

Article Tier 2

Making the Case for the Humanities’ Take on the Crucial Issue of Ecological Crisis

This paper argues for the importance of humanities perspectives in addressing the ecological crisis, contending that scientific approaches alone are insufficient and that ethical, cultural, and social analysis are essential for understanding and responding to environmental challenges.

Article Tier 2

From Science to Science: Lessons Learned from the Disappearing Plastic Gyres

This commentary reflects on the paradox that while scientific progress has brought great benefits, it has also created serious environmental problems like ocean plastic pollution that are difficult to reverse once recognized. The piece questions whether the long-term harms of plastic production were adequately considered before widespread adoption.

Share this paper