0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Food & Water Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Microplastic in wastewater treatment plants in Telemark

Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo) 2019
Ørsland, Asbjørn

Summary

Microplastics were detected in both the incoming and outgoing wastewater and in the sludge of treatment plants in Norway's Telemark region, confirming that wastewater treatment plants are both sinks and sources of microplastic pollution. The findings contribute to a growing body of evidence on the role of wastewater treatment in microplastic cycling.

Study Type Environmental

Microplastics (defined as 5 mm to 1 μm in diameter) has been observed in zooplankton fish and human beings in various studies. The amount of microplastic is an increasing concern worldwide, and one of the sources that contributes to microplastic in the environment is wastewater treatment plants. The aim of this study was to analyse the presence of microplastics in inlet, effluent wastewater and sludge, and to develop an appropriate analysing procedure based on a thorough review of past literature. This study was executed in cooperation with SWECO located at Seljord, where a total of 8 wastewater treatment plants were chosen. Four of these plants carry out biological treatment and these plants were investigated in this thesis. Sampling was done in the period from June to October 2018. The samples were extracted during the monthly sampling for chemical analysis. The sampling was carried out by staff at the wastewater treatment plants where 38 wastewater samples and 19 sludge samples were taken during this period. Wastewater and sludge sample was sterilised with 70% ethanol, then the wastewater was vacuum filtrated with Whatman GF/C filters. After the sterilisation the sludge was dried before adding Fenton’s reagent followed by a flotation with filtered tap water and vacuum filtration. GF/C filters from both samples was then stored in aluminium coated petri dishes after the vacuum filtration and visual observed with digital stereo microscope (Karl Zeiss Discovery V20). Microplastics was detected in all samples in this study with an average of 8544 particles kg¯¹ dry weight (d.w.) for sludge and 13644 microplastic particles/L for inlet and 6255 microplastic particles/L outlet wastewater samples. There seems not to be any relation between income of wastewater (m3/d) and the amount of microplastic observed within the samples. Particles from wastewater consisted of fibres (11%), fragments (59%) and beads (30%) and most of the particles were white/transparent and blue. Particles from sludge consisted of fibres/filaments (72%), fragments (23%) and beads (5%), where most observed particles where black fibres. For further research a procedure that includes removal of cellulose would make it easier for visual detection of MP in the samples.

Share this paper