We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comparative toxicity of exfoliating products containing microplastics and alternative particles from Nepal
Summary
Researchers tested the toxicity of exfoliating cosmetic products containing microplastics against those using natural alternative particles from Nepal, finding differences in how each affected aquatic organisms. The study informs debates about whether natural alternatives to synthetic microbeads in cosmetics are truly safer for the environment.
Plastic pollution is a global problem, with numerous studies focusing on the effects of\nmicroplastics (1- 1000 μm). Cosmetic products like exfoliators have been identified as an\nimportant source of primary microplastics. After abundant reports on the hazards caused by\nmicroplastics, subsequent banning or voluntary removal from cosmetics is going on, causing them\nto be replaced by the non- plastic alternative particles. However, the replacement by so- called\nnatural particles seems to be just a marketing strategy and lacks enough research verifying if they\nare actually safer than microplastics.\nThe present study investigated the chemical and particle toxicity of eight exfoliators containing\nmicroplastics and alternative particles used in Nepal. This was addressed by means of two in vitro\nand one in vivo assay. The bioluminescent bacteria Photobacterium leiognathi was exposed to 2-\n300 μg product and particles extracts and luminescence inhibition was measured. The recombinant\nyeast strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae containing a gene coding for human estrogen receptor alpha\nwas exposed to 500 μg product and particle extract and estrogenicity was measured. Daphnia\nmagna neonates (< 24 h old) were exposed to 2- 45 μm microplastic and alternative particles at\n0.8 – 500 mg/L for 21-days and survival and reproduction was examined.\nThe chemical toxicity from products was higher than the particle toxicity for bacteria with no\nsignificant differences among microplastic and alternative particles. Most of the ingredients in the\nproducts were unknown and thus the observed toxicity could not be attributed to any specific\nchemical. In the YES, only one sample that contained parabens was estrogenic in the product\nextract but not the particle extract. Both types of particles did not show any adsorbance. From in\nvivo assay, the alternative particles had stronger effects in the lethality of D. magna whereas\nmicroplastics caused higher reproductive effects.\nBased on the findings of this study, alternative particles cannot be considered safer than\nmicroplastics and with regards to products from Nepal, chemicals used in the cosmetics seem to\nbe of more concern. Since this study analyzed only exfoliators, study on effects of other classes of\ncosmetics using environmentally relevant concentrations and other bioassays needs to be done in\nthe future.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Assessing the biodegradability of microparticles disposed down the drain
This study tested the biodegradability of microparticles made from natural and biodegradable materials proposed as alternatives to synthetic microplastic particles in personal care products, finding that they broke down efficiently under standard conditions. The results support the use of naturally derived microparticles as safer substitutes for plastic microbeads in cosmetics.
An Eco-friendly Alternative to Polyethylene Microbeads in Personal Healthcare Products
This paper proposes eco-friendly, biodegradable alternatives to polyethylene microbeads used as exfoliants in personal care products like shower gels. Replacing synthetic plastic microbeads with natural materials would reduce a direct source of microplastic pollution entering waterways through drain runoff.
Microplastic exposure in aquatic invertebrates can cause significant negative effects compared to natural particles - A meta-analysis.
This meta-analysis pools data from 26 studies comparing the effects of microplastics versus natural particles on aquatic animals. The findings show that microplastics cause more harm to growth, reproduction, and survival than natural particles in some species, suggesting that the chemical composition of plastics, not just the physical presence of particles, contributes to their toxicity.
Microplastics: Applications in the Cosmetic Industry and Impacts on the Aquatic Environment
This review examines how microplastics are used in cosmetics as microbeads in products like exfoliating cleansers, and how these particles enter waterways through drain disposal and harm aquatic life. The authors summarize the main problems caused by cosmetic microplastics and discuss regulatory efforts to phase them out.
Microplastics in Cosmetics and Personal Care Products: Impacts on Aquatic Life and Rodents with Potential Alternatives
This review examined microplastics in cosmetics and personal care products as a major environmental source, cataloguing their types and concentrations in commercial formulations and reviewing evidence that they harm aquatic organisms and rodents through ingestion, bioaccumulation, and chemical co-exposure, while also surveying biodegradable alternatives.