We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Increasing Students' Quality of Argumentation by Using Drama in Lower Phase Secondary Education
Summary
This study explored how drama can improve the quality of student arguments about controversial socio-scientific topics including environmental issues. Improving public science literacy and debate skills is important for building societal capacity to address challenges like microplastic pollution.
In this study it is explored how drama can be used as a teaching tool to foster the quality of students' argumentation about socio-scientific issues in the lower phase of secondary education (ages 12 to 15). Four biology classes of a high school in The Netherlands took part in this study, containing a total of 117 students. Two of these classes formed a control group attending regular lessons, the other two classes attended an intervention in which drama was used as a teaching tool. Both the intervention- and control lessons consisted of the same topics. The following six topics were used: Bee mortality, Bird mortality, Exotic species, Pollution due to medicine, Pollution due to microplastics, and Sustainable holidays. At the start of the lesson series all of the students took a pre-test, and at the end of the lessons all of the students took a post-test, both measuring their quality of argumentation. During the lessons field notes were taken be the researchers, and the final performances of the intervention groups were videotaped and transcribed. The transcriptions from the final performances were scored to measure the quality of argumentation they contained. Qualitative descriptions of the intervention lessons are given, and the data from the pre- and post-surveys is analysed. The results from the pre- and post-tests show an increase in the quality of argumentation for the intervention group. In the post-test the students created more extensive arguments containing more rebuttals than they did in the pre-test. No significant difference in the quality of argumentation for the control group was found. This suggests that drama is a valid teaching tool to help foster the quality of argumentation in the lower phase of secondary education. The qualitative analysis suggests that for students in this age group a strong focus on acquiring information is needed, the students that spend more time researching their topics created plays containing higher quality argumentation, and ended up improving their argumentation the most.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Scientific literacy through Problem-Based Learning focusing on the occurrence and consequences of microplastics in the environment
Researchers implemented a Problem-Based Learning approach to develop scientific literacy skills in students by focusing on the occurrence and environmental consequences of microplastics. The study, conducted in a Portuguese-language educational context, used microplastics as a real-world science topic to cultivate critical thinking and evidence-based decision-making competencies.
Science Literacy Profile of High School Students: Implications of PBL Didactic Design on the Topic of Microplastics
This education research paper is not primarily about microplastic risks; it studies Indonesian high school students' scientific literacy after a problem-based learning curriculum using microplastics as a teaching topic, assessing students' ability to explain phenomena, evaluate investigations, and interpret data within the PISA framework.
How to Increase Ocean Literacy for Future Ocean Sustainability? The Influence of Non-Formal Marine Science Education
This study examined whether non-formal marine science education programs improve ocean literacy in students, finding that hands-on marine experiences significantly increased knowledge and environmental awareness. Improving ocean literacy is considered essential for building public support for policies to reduce marine plastic pollution.
School science activities with contributions from STEM practices: A study to address complex problems in elementary school classes, in the case of microplastics and their harmful effects
Researchers developed a theoretical and explanatory framework identifying which aspects of STEM education can strengthen the design of school science activities addressing complex problems such as microplastic pollution in elementary school settings. The study proposes a model for integrating STEM practices into classroom activities to build students' capacity to engage with real-world environmental challenges.
토의 . 토론 기법을 활용한 해양환경교육 프로그램이 초등학생의 환경소양 및 비판적 사고력에 미치는 영향
Korean researchers developed a marine environmental education program for elementary school students using discussion and debate techniques. The program covered topics including microplastic pollution, nuclear accidents, and marine biodiversity, and improved students' environmental literacy and critical thinking.