0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Anthropocene

Open Encyclopedia of Anthropology 2019 34 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Liana Chua, Hannah Fair

Summary

This review examines how anthropologists have engaged with the concept of the 'Anthropocene', identifying four main disciplinary approaches to the phenomena of human-driven planetary change including climate change and mass extinction. Researchers found that the term functions both as a scientific descriptor of Earth system disruption and as a politically and morally loaded concept within and beyond academia.

‘The Anthropocene’ is a term that is increasingly used to define a new planetary epoch: one in which humans have become the dominant force shaping Earth’s bio-geophysical composition and processes. Although it originated in the Earth Sciences, it has since been widely adopted across academia and the public sphere as a catch-all description for the overwhelming impact of human activity on the planet. This entry examines how anthropologists have engaged with the Anthropocene, both as a set of phenomena (e.g. climate change, mass extinction) and as a politically and morally loaded concept. It identifies four main anthropological approaches to the Anthropocene, those that: 1) take the Anthropocene as a context for or backdrop to ethnographic inquiry; 2) interrogate ‘the Anthropocene’ as a socially and politically constructed idea; 3) treat the Anthropocene as an opportunity for creativity and hopeful speculation; and 4) view the Anthropocene as the outcome of long-standing global political and socio-economic inequalities. Such approaches entail distinct methods, analytical frameworks, concepts, and ethico-political programmes. Collectively, they form a large and still-evolving body of work that destabilises divisions between ‘nature’ and ‘culture’ and ‘humans’ and ‘non-humans’, as well as the scholarly disciplines traditionally built around them. In this capacity, they are also pushing anthropologists to ask what distinctive methodological, analytical, and ethico-political contributions their discipline can make to the burgeoning interdisciplinary field of Anthropocene studies.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

The Anthropocene: Comparing Its Meaning in Geology (Chronostratigraphy) with Conceptual Approaches Arising in Other Disciplines

This article compares how the term "Anthropocene" is used in geology versus other academic disciplines like social sciences and humanities. In geology, the Anthropocene is proposed as a formal epoch beginning in the mid-twentieth century, marked by measurable changes in the geological record from industrialization and globalization. Other fields use the term more flexibly, often extending it much further back in time and applying it without reference to specific geological markers.

Article Tier 2

Horn, Eva, Bergthaller, Hannes, (2020). The Anthropocene: Key Issues for the Humanities

This book review covers a 2020 interdisciplinary volume examining the Anthropocene as a concept for the humanities, addressing key issues around human impact on Earth systems, geological time, and the cultural and philosophical implications of planetary-scale change.

Article Tier 2

Anthropocene: The Challenges for a New World

This review examines the concept of the Anthropocene, tracing how humanity has become a geological force rivalling natural processes, with particular attention to the environmental challenges this new epoch presents for Earth system science.

Article Tier 2

Anthropocene angst: Authentic geology and stratigraphic sincerity

Based on four years of ethnographic observation of the Anthropocene Working Group, this article explains why the proposal to formalize the Anthropocene as a geologic epoch was rejected in 2024, arguing the effort blurred the boundary between scientific fact and political normative claims.

Article Tier 2

The Anthropocene within the Geological Time Scale: a response to fundamental questions

This paper responded to fundamental questions about the Anthropocene as a formal geological time unit, addressing evidence for its recognition within the Geological Time Scale and clarifying the stratigraphic criteria used to define it.

Share this paper