0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Optimization of Immersed Membrane Integrated in Sedimentation Tank of WTP Ngagel Surabaya

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers integrated a submerged microfiltration membrane module into the sedimentation tank of the Ngagel Water Treatment Plant in Surabaya, Indonesia, to evaluate its effectiveness in removing microplastics, E. coli, organics, and TSS from Surabaya River water. Testing with variations in baffles and air scouring conditions showed the membrane improved filtrate quality beyond conventional coagulation-flocculation-sedimentation treatment, with flux and filtrate performance characterised under different operational parameters.

Study Type Environmental

ABSTRACT The Surabaya River is the primary source of raw water for water supply, but its quality is not satisfactory, especially regarding organics, Escherichia coli ( E. coli ), microplastics, and TSS. The Ngagel Water Treatment Plant (WTP) treats the Surabaya River water using conventional systems like coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation, and filtration. However, the performance of these conventional systems is not as good as the processing with membranes. To test the effectiveness of immersed membrane microfiltration, research was conducted to integrate it into the Ngagel WTP sedimentation unit. The objective was to evaluate the performance of the microfiltration membrane module in terms of flux, filtrate quality, and the effects of baffles and air scouring on the membrane performance. The microfiltration membrane was placed in the downstream sedimentation tank, with variations in baffle slope, air scouring, and pressure. The study compared the levels of organics, E. coli , microplastics, and TSS in the Surabaya River with regulatory standards, showing that these parameters exceeded permissible limits, highlighting the urgency for improved treatment solutions. The findings demonstrate the applicability of this approach to other WTPs facing similar challenges, contributing to advancements in membrane‐based treatment strategies. The study revealed that an operational suction pressure of 0.6 to 0.9 bar would produce a flux of 43 to 392 L/m 2 /h. The quality of the filtrate was in the range of 0.28 to 0.41 NTU for turbidity, 0 to 9.5 mg/L for TSS, 2 to 15 particles/L for microplastics, 11 to 16 mg/L for organic substances as permanganate value, and 0 MPN/100 mL for E. coli . The research also found that adding baffles resulted in a 12% increase in the volume of filtrate produced. However, the addition of baffles did not affect the quality of the filtrate. Furthermore, adding air scouring with pressures of 0.3 and 0.6 bar resulted in an 88% recovery volume of filtrate.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Comparison Performances of Microfiltration and Rapid Sand Filter Operated in Water Treatment Plant

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared the performance of immersed microfiltration membranes against conventional rapid sand filtration for treating river water at a water treatment plant. They found that membrane technology offered advantages including more compact footprint, greater surface area per volume, and improved removal of microorganisms smaller than 0.01 mm, while requiring less wash water than conventional sand filters.

Article Tier 2

Effects of Permeate Flux in Adsorption/Coagulation-Membrane Filtration System for Removing Turbid Matter and Humic Acid from River Water

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers investigated the effects of varying permeate flux in an adsorption/coagulation-membrane filtration system designed to remove turbid matter, humic acid, and microplastics from river water intended for drinking. They found that permeate flux significantly influenced membrane fouling rates and removal efficiency of natural organic matter and colloidal particles, informing operational optimization of this combined treatment approach.

Article Tier 2

An evaluation of microplastics fate in the wastewater treatment plants: frequency and removal of microplastics by microfiltration membrane

AI summary Read the abstract

This study assessed microplastic removal efficiency at a wastewater treatment plant in Iran and tested microfiltration membrane performance, finding that the membrane significantly improved microplastic removal beyond conventional treatment steps.

Article Tier 2

Emerging contaminants in wastewater treatment: the effect of microplastics in an Integrated Fixed-film Activated Sludge (IFAS) Membrane BioReactor (MBR)

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers evaluated the effectiveness of an Integrated Fixed-film Activated Sludge membrane bioreactor pilot system for removing microplastics from wastewater, comparing it to conventional secondary sedimentation in the context of growing recognition of microplastics as a priority emerging contaminant.

Article Tier 2

Effectiveness of Microplastic Removal from River Water Using Conventional and Ultrafiltration Techniques: Correlation with Physicochemical Parameters

AI summary Read the abstract

This study compared conventional and ultrafiltration water treatment methods for removing microplastics from river water in Indonesia, finding that ultrafiltration achieved significantly higher MP removal efficiencies, suggesting it as a more effective option for addressing MP contamination in drinking water.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper