0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Freshwater and airborne textile fibre populations are dominated by ‘natural’, not microplastic, fibres

The Science of The Total Environment 2019 364 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Thomas H. Stanton, Matthew F. Johnson, C. Paul Nathanail, William MacNaughtan, Rachel L. Gomes

Summary

Researchers monitoring fibre pollution in a UK river and its surrounding air over twelve months found that natural textile fibres (e.g., cotton, wool) dominated the samples, representing 93.8% of all fibres detected, while synthetic microplastic fibres were entirely absent from more than 80% of samples.

Study Type Environmental

The potential role of natural textile fibres as environmental pollutants has been speculated upon by some environmental scientists, however, there is a general consensus that their biodegradability reduces their environmental threat. Whilst the risks that they pose remain poorly understood, their environmental prevalence has been noted in several recent microplastic pollution manuscripts. Here we highlight the extent to which natural textile fibres dominate fibre populations of upstream reaches of the River Trent, UK, as well as the atmospheric deposition within its catchment, over a twelve month microplastic sampling campaign. Across 223 samples, natural textile fibres represented 93.8% of the textile fibre population quantified. Moreover, though microplastic particles including synthetic fibres are known to be pervasive environmental pollutants, extruded textile fibres were absent from 82.8% of samples. Natural textile fibres were absent from just 9.7% of samples.

Share this paper