We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Freshwater and airborne textile fibre populations are dominated by ‘natural’, not microplastic, fibres
Summary
Researchers monitoring fibre pollution in a UK river and its surrounding air over twelve months found that natural textile fibres (e.g., cotton, wool) dominated the samples, representing 93.8% of all fibres detected, while synthetic microplastic fibres were entirely absent from more than 80% of samples.
The potential role of natural textile fibres as environmental pollutants has been speculated upon by some environmental scientists, however, there is a general consensus that their biodegradability reduces their environmental threat. Whilst the risks that they pose remain poorly understood, their environmental prevalence has been noted in several recent microplastic pollution manuscripts. Here we highlight the extent to which natural textile fibres dominate fibre populations of upstream reaches of the River Trent, UK, as well as the atmospheric deposition within its catchment, over a twelve month microplastic sampling campaign. Across 223 samples, natural textile fibres represented 93.8% of the textile fibre population quantified. Moreover, though microplastic particles including synthetic fibres are known to be pervasive environmental pollutants, extruded textile fibres were absent from 82.8% of samples. Natural textile fibres were absent from just 9.7% of samples.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Synthetic and non-synthetic anthropogenic fibers in a river under the impact of Paris Megacity: Sampling methodological aspects and flux estimations.
This study sampled a French river downstream of Paris and measured both synthetic and natural processed fibers in the water, finding high concentrations of fibers with significant short-term variability. The research highlights that fiber pollution extends beyond conventional plastic particles to include a wide range of textile-derived materials that are often missed in standard monitoring.
Microfibers in oceanic surface waters: A global characterization
A global analysis of 916 seawater samples from six ocean basins characterized microfibers as ubiquitous contaminants, finding that many are not synthetic textiles but natural or semi-synthetic materials, questioning the assumption that all environmental fibers are microplastic.
Fragmented fibre (including microplastic) pollution from textiles
This review examined fragmented fiber pollution from all textile types including natural, regenerated, and synthetic fabrics, finding that all textiles release fibers throughout their lifecycle from manufacturing to washing to disposal, and that natural fiber shedding has been underestimated relative to synthetic fibers in pollution assessments.
Assessment of Microplastics in the Environment – Fibres: the Disregarded Twin?
This paper argues that synthetic fibers are systematically underestimated in environmental microplastic monitoring because they are often excluded from sampling protocols. Since synthetic textiles are ubiquitous and shed fibers through washing and wear, ignoring fibers means current assessments substantially undercount total microplastic environmental pollution.
Occurrence, sources, fate and transport of textile fibers in oceanic environments
This review covers the occurrence, sources, transport pathways, and environmental fate of synthetic and natural textile fibers in oceanic environments. Despite global fiber production exceeding 107 million tonnes annually, the authors find that natural fibers (cotton, wool) are actually more abundant than synthetic fibers in most environmental samples.