0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

A participatory scenario method to explore the future of marine social‐ecological systems

Fish and Fisheries 2019 47 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 35 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Benjamin Planque, Johanna J. Heymans, Jean‐Marc Fromentin, Christian Mullon, Per Arneberg, Arne Eide, Jean‐Marc Fromentin, Johanna J. Heymans, Johanna J. Heymans, Alf Håkon Hoel, Susa Niiranen, Geir Ottersen, Olivier Thébaud Anne Britt Sandø, Martin Sommerkorn, Martin Sommerkorn, Susa Niiranen, Olivier Thébaud Thorbjørn Thorvik, Thorbjørn Thorvik, Geir Ottersen, Olivier Thébaud

Summary

This paper presents a method for creating participatory scenarios to explore possible futures for marine social-ecological systems, involving scientists, managers, and stakeholders. Building shared visions for ocean health is relevant to how communities develop responses to marine plastic pollution.

Study Type Environmental

Abstract Anticipating future changes in marine social‐ecological systems ( MSES ) several decades into the future is essential in the context of accelerating global change. This is challenging in situations where actors do not share common understandings, practices, or visions about the future. We introduce a dedicated scenario method for the development of MSES scenarios in a participatory context. The objective is to allow different actors to jointly develop scenarios which contain their multiple visions of the future. The method starts from four perspectives: “fisheries management,” “ecosystem,” “ocean climate,” and “global context and governance” for which current status and recent trends are summarized. Contrasted scenarios about possible futures are elaborated for each of the four single perspectives before being integrated into multiple‐perspective scenarios. Selected scenarios are then developed into storylines. Focusing on individual perspectives until near the end allows actors with diverse cultures, interests and horizons to confront their own notions of the future. We illustrate the method with the exploration of the futures of the Barents Sea MSES by 2050. We emphasize the following lessons learned: first, many actors are not familiar with scenario building and attention must be paid to explaining the purpose, methodology, and benefits of scenarios exercises. Second, although the Barents Sea MSES is relatively well understood, uncertainties about its future are significant. Third, it is important to focus on unlikely events. Fourth, all perspectives should be treated equally. Fifth, as MSES are continuously changing, we can only be prepared for future changes if we collectively keep preparing.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper