0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Sign in to save

Effects of polyester microfibers on soil physical properties: Perception from a field and a pot experiment

The Science of The Total Environment 2019 491 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 50 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Guosheng Zhang Guosheng Zhang Guosheng Zhang F.X. Zhang, F.X. Zhang, F.X. Zhang, F.X. Zhang, X.T. Li, Guosheng Zhang Guosheng Zhang X.T. Li, Guosheng Zhang

Summary

Polyester microfiber additions to clayey soil at 0.1% and 0.3% concentrations in field and pot experiments significantly increased large pore volume (>30 μm) and reduced small pore volume (<30 μm) but did not affect bulk density or saturated hydraulic conductivity. The findings indicate that polyester microfibers alter soil pore structure in ways that could influence water retention and plant-available water in agricultural soils.

Understanding soil physical properties is essential for soil quality management and sustainable land use. With the growing accumulation of microplastics in soils, a better understanding of the impact of microplastics on soil physical properties is crucial to conserve and manage soil quality. This study explored the effects of polyester microfiber (PMF) concentrations (0, 0.1% and 0.3%) on bulk density, porosity, aggregation and hydraulic conductivity of a clayey soil from a field experiment (1 year) and a pot experiment (6 wet-dry cycles). Polyester microfibers significantly increased the volume of >30 μm pores and reduced the volume of <30 μm pores compared to the control treatment. However, there were no detectable changes in the soil bulk density and saturated hydraulic conductivity between the PMF treatments and the control treatment. Interestingly, we observed that polyester microfibers significantly increased the contents of water stable large macroaggregates (>2 mm) in the 0.3% PMF (44%) and 0.1% PMF (39%) treatments compared to the control treatment (31%) in the pot experiment, but this was not true in the field experiment. The efficient interaction between polyester microfibers and fine soil particles and the frequent wet-dry cycles enhanced the formation and stability of macro-aggregates induced by polyester microfibers in the pot experiment. Overall, our results provide valuable evidence for microplastic influences on soil physical properties. Because microplastics are long-term anthropogenic contaminants, it is necessary to further study the impacts of microplastics on soil quality for terrestrial ecosystem sustainability.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper