We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Response to Referee 2
AI summary Read the abstract
This document is a response to a referee's comments on a scientific manuscript, likely related to environmental science or materials research involving microplastics or related topics. Peer review responses are part of the quality assurance process that strengthens published environmental science.
The manuscript describes the trajectory and fate differences of the neustic microplastic in three scenarios, i.e. 2D only, 3D weak vertical turbulence and 3D strong vertical turbulence. And it tries to indicate the importance of the 3D approach.
More Papers Like This
Reply on RC2
AI summary Read the abstract
This second author reply addresses additional peer reviewer feedback on a microplastics study, clarifying analytical choices and responding to questions about data interpretation and extrapolation of results to environmental conditions.
Reply on RC1
AI summary Read the abstract
This author reply responds to reviewer comments on a manuscript about microplastic research, addressing methodological concerns and clarifying findings related to particle characterization and exposure assessment. The exchange contributes to the peer review discourse on emerging standards in microplastic science.
Sources, fate and effects of microplastics in the marine environment: part 2 of a global assessment
AI summary Read the abstract
This second part of a major GESAMP review on microplastics in the marine environment examined sources, fate, and effects, providing a comprehensive scientific assessment of the state of evidence and priority research needs.
Microplastics in the environment: Much ado about nothing? A debate
AI summary Read the abstract
This is the introductory entry of a two-scientist debate on the environmental significance of microplastics, setting the stage for a structured scientific exchange on whether concerns about microplastic pollution are proportionate to the available evidence.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.