We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Microplastics favor forbs over grasses in drylands: Opposing roles of particulates and chemical leachates on germination and plant traits
AI summary Read the abstract
Microplastics affect different types of dryland plants in very different ways, which could gradually shift the mix of plant species in arid ecosystems. In controlled experiments, plastic particles physically slowed the germination of grasses and reduced their growth — probably by trapping seeds and drying out soil — while forbs (non-grass flowering plants) were largely unaffected or even stimulated by chemical leachates from the plastic. The researchers conclude that microplastic pollution may act as an environmental filter that favors stress-tolerant forbs over grasses, potentially reshaping dryland plant communities over time.
Abstract Background and aims Drylands face increasing microplastic pollution. We tested how plastic particulates and leachable chemicals affect key dryland plants (grasses and forbs). Methods We performed two controlled experiments using dryland grasses and forbs, and evaluated the effect of plastic particulates and leachables on germination, plant morphological and physiological traits. Results Plastic particulates reduced grasses germination velocity by ~ 17% compared to soils without particulates, likely by trapping seeds and impairing water uptake. Most forbs were marginally affected, although germination was inhibited in mucilage-producing species. Notably, leachates stimulated forbs germination through hormesis, contrasting with particulates physical inhibition. For instance, E. vulgare velocity increased by ~ 20% with leachates than without them. However, this stimulation was transient and faded in later development. Grasses shoot mass decreased by ~ 21% with particulates, likely from soil water loss via plastic-induced cracks, an effect exacerbated by their shallow root systems. Forbs avoided this stress through deeper rooting and benefited from improved soil aeration, which enhanced shoot growth by ~ 61% compared to control. Grasses allocated carbon to stress tolerance, increasing photosynthetic rates (+ 15%) and water-use efficiency (+ 7.2%). Forbs favored shoot growth despite lower photosynthetis (-8.1%) and water-use efficiency (-25%), using thinner leaves and higher transpiration rates. Root morphology also critically influence tolerance to microplastics. The divergent particulate effects on grasses and forbs, reveal a mechanistic trade-off between stress tolerance and growth investment. Conclusion Microplastic particulates, more than leachates, drive plant responses, suggesting that plastic pollution may act as environmental filter by favoring stress-adapted forbs over grasses.
More Papers Like This
Plastic particles and their additives promote plant invasion through physicochemical mechanisms on seed germination
AI summary Read the abstract
Scientists found that microplastic particles in soil harmed the germination of native European grassland plants, reducing sprouting speed and total germination by up to 30%. Invasive plant species, however, were mostly unaffected by the same microplastic exposure. This suggests that plastic pollution in soil could shift the balance between native and invasive plants, potentially threatening biodiversity.
Microplastics as habitat-dependent ecological filters: facilitating plant invasion in water while reinforcing biotic resistance on land
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers investigated whether microplastics act as context-dependent ecological filters that differently affect invasive and native plant species in aquatic versus terrestrial habitats. The study found that microplastics facilitated plant invasion in water while reinforcing biotic resistance on land, with effects varying by polymer type and particle size across polyethylene, nylon, and biodegradable PLA.
Effects of Microplastic Particles and Microplastic Leachate on the Germination and Growth of Lolium multiflorum
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers tested whether polypropylene microplastic particles and the chemicals they leach affect Italian ryegrass germination and growth. Both physical microplastic particles and their leachate reduced germination rates and seedling growth, suggesting that both the particles themselves and their chemical additives can harm terrestrial plants.
Effects of Microplastic Fibers and Drought on Plant Communities
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers added microplastic fibers to plant communities and applied drought stress, finding that microfibers reduced total community productivity and shifted species composition, with combined microplastic-drought stress causing greater harm than either factor alone.
Plant functional traits, but not soil abiotic properties, mediate the legacy effects of microplastics on plant community assembly
AI summary Read the abstract
Microplastics left behind in soil don't just disappear—they leave a lasting "memory" that reshapes which plants thrive there, favoring grasses over legumes (like beans and peas, which enrich soil naturally). This happens not by changing soil chemistry, but by altering how plants grow and function internally, which could affect food crop diversity and soil health in farmland exposed to plastic pollution. While this study focused on plant communities rather than direct human health effects, it's a reminder that microplastic contamination in soil can have ripple effects on the food-growing ecosystems we depend on.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.