We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Microplastics favor forbs over grasses in drylands: Opposing roles of particulates and chemical leachates on germination and plant traits
Summary
Microplastics affect different types of dryland plants in very different ways, which could gradually shift the mix of plant species in arid ecosystems. In controlled experiments, plastic particles physically slowed the germination of grasses and reduced their growth — probably by trapping seeds and drying out soil — while forbs (non-grass flowering plants) were largely unaffected or even stimulated by chemical leachates from the plastic. The researchers conclude that microplastic pollution may act as an environmental filter that favors stress-tolerant forbs over grasses, potentially reshaping dryland plant communities over time.
Abstract Background and aims Drylands face increasing microplastic pollution. We tested how plastic particulates and leachable chemicals affect key dryland plants (grasses and forbs). Methods We performed two controlled experiments using dryland grasses and forbs, and evaluated the effect of plastic particulates and leachables on germination, plant morphological and physiological traits. Results Plastic particulates reduced grasses germination velocity by ~ 17% compared to soils without particulates, likely by trapping seeds and impairing water uptake. Most forbs were marginally affected, although germination was inhibited in mucilage-producing species. Notably, leachates stimulated forbs germination through hormesis, contrasting with particulates physical inhibition. For instance, E. vulgare velocity increased by ~ 20% with leachates than without them. However, this stimulation was transient and faded in later development. Grasses shoot mass decreased by ~ 21% with particulates, likely from soil water loss via plastic-induced cracks, an effect exacerbated by their shallow root systems. Forbs avoided this stress through deeper rooting and benefited from improved soil aeration, which enhanced shoot growth by ~ 61% compared to control. Grasses allocated carbon to stress tolerance, increasing photosynthetic rates (+ 15%) and water-use efficiency (+ 7.2%). Forbs favored shoot growth despite lower photosynthetis (-8.1%) and water-use efficiency (-25%), using thinner leaves and higher transpiration rates. Root morphology also critically influence tolerance to microplastics. The divergent particulate effects on grasses and forbs, reveal a mechanistic trade-off between stress tolerance and growth investment. Conclusion Microplastic particulates, more than leachates, drive plant responses, suggesting that plastic pollution may act as environmental filter by favoring stress-adapted forbs over grasses.
Sign in to start a discussion.