0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Microplastics in bivalves and their habitat in relation to shellfish aquaculture proximity in coastal British Columbia, Canada

Aquaculture Environment Interactions 2019 105 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Garth A. Covernton Brenna Collicutt, Garth A. Covernton Garth A. Covernton Brenna Collicutt, Garth A. Covernton Brenna Collicutt, Garth A. Covernton Garth A. Covernton Garth A. Covernton Garth A. Covernton Garth A. Covernton Garth A. Covernton Garth A. Covernton Garth A. Covernton Garth A. Covernton Garth A. Covernton Garth A. Covernton Brenna Collicutt, Garth A. Covernton HJ Gurney-Smith, HJ Gurney-Smith, Garth A. Covernton CM Pearce, Garth A. Covernton Garth A. Covernton CM Pearce, Garth A. Covernton JF Dower, JF Dower, Garth A. Covernton PS Ross, PS Ross, SE Dudas, SE Dudas, Garth A. Covernton

Summary

Researchers compared microplastic concentrations in Manila clams and Pacific oysters grown at commercial shellfish aquaculture sites versus reference beaches in coastal British Columbia, finding that proximity to aquaculture operations influenced microplastic levels in both bivalves and surrounding sediments.

Polymers
Study Type Environmental

Shellfish aquaculture often uses large amounts of plastic equipment and has been suggested as a potential source of microplastic contamination in the marine environment. To determine the influence of shellfish aquaculture on microplastic concentrations in bivalves and their environment, we compared microplastic particle (MP) concentrations in Manila clams Venerupis philippinarum and Pacific oysters Crassostrea gigas grown on commercial shellfish beaches with those in individuals of the same species grown on nearby non-aquaculture beaches in 6 regions of coastal British Columbia, Canada. MP concentrations did not differ between shellfish aquaculture and non-aquaculture sites for either bivalve species, sediment, or water samples. Plastic presence differed by site and oysters on sites with many synthetic anti-predator nets contained significantly, yet marginally, more MPs than those on sites without (0.05 vs. 0.03 g -1 dry-tissue weight on average). However, analysis of suspected MPs using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy in dicated a predominance of fibres from textiles (including nylon and polyester), which are not typically used in shellfish aquaculture, suggesting that this may be caused by the larger average body weight of oysters grown at non-aquaculture sites rather than by the degradation of aquaculture infrastructure.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper