0
Article Tier 2 Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

A critical analysis of the consequences of the EU-proposed ban on single-use plastic items

reposiTUm (TU Wien) 2019 3 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

This critical analysis examines the consequences of the EU's proposed ban on certain single-use plastic items such as cutlery and straws, noting that while the policy addresses visible litter, it may create unintended environmental trade-offs if replacement materials have higher lifecycle impacts. The paper calls for a broader, systems-level approach to reducing marine plastic pollution.

Study Type Environmental

In recent years, marine litter became one of the biggest concerns. Worldwide, 9 million tonnes of mismanaged plastic waste enter the oceans every year, and the adverse effects on the environment will multiply. By proposing a new directive “on the reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment” (single-use plastics) in 2018, the European Union has itself committed to combat macro plastic marine litter. The ban on certain plastic products, including cutlery and straws, enjoys the most popularity. For this reason, the masters thesis studied the impacts that the ban will have on the environment and the plastic industry. The outcome was disillusioning. Only 220 tonnes of marine litter from the banned items could have been reduced by 2030. Compared to the annual amount of 15,000 tonnes in Europe, or 9 million tonnes of mismanaged plastic waste that flows into the ocean worldwide, the 220 tonnes are neglectable. Although the reduction may be observable throughout beach counts, an assessment of the actual impact on the environment (e.g., reduction in the number of entanglements of species) is not envisaged under the proposal. Furthermore, a great resistance of the industry to the implementation of the ban is not expected. Although the impact of the ban is minimal, the overall value of the legislative proposal is not. When properly implemented and monitored, the action taken by the EU can further raise awareness, trigger more countries to act, and be the starting point of the needed international and global cooperation that is needed to combat marine litter.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Addressing the single-use plastic proliferation problem

AI summary Read the abstract

This review examined the effectiveness of single-use plastic bans as a policy tool for addressing plastic pollution, evaluating evidence on their environmental impact and discussing alternative regulatory approaches. The authors found that while bans have reduced certain plastic categories, broader systemic changes to plastic production and waste management are needed.

Article Tier 2

A Critical Analysis of the Rising Global Demand of Plastics and its Adverse Impact on Environmental Sustainability

AI summary Read the abstract

This critical review examined global trends in plastic demand and mismanaged plastic waste, identifying the top contributing countries and evaluating plastic replacement alternatives, arguing that reducing consumption and improving waste management infrastructure are more impactful than material substitution alone.

Article Tier 2

Plasticless: a Comparative Life-cycle, Socio-economic, and Policy Analysis of Alternatives to Plastic Straws

AI summary Read the abstract

A life-cycle analysis compared ten types of drinking straws, finding that while plastic straws have the highest environmental impact, some alternatives like glass and metal require significant energy to produce and clean. This analysis illustrates that no single-use plastic alternative is without environmental trade-offs.

Article Tier 2

Life Cycle Assessment of Banned Single-Use Plastic Products and Their Alternatives

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers conducted a life cycle assessment comparing banned single-use plastic products in Canada with their alternatives, including paper, cotton, and bioplastic options. They found that while banning plastics reduces plastic pollution, some alternatives have higher carbon footprints or water usage. The study suggests that effective policy needs to consider the full environmental impact of replacement materials, not just plastic waste reduction.

Article Tier 2

An Environmental and Cost Comparison Between Polypropylene Plastic Drinking Straws and a "Greener" Alternative: An Oberlin Case Study

AI summary Read the abstract

This paper compares the environmental impact and cost of plastic versus paper drinking straws, finding that plastic straws are one of the most commonly littered items that harm marine ecosystems. The analysis supports policy arguments for reducing single-use plastic straw consumption.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper