0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Sign in to save

Comment on "exposure to microplastics (<10 μm) associated to plastic bottles mineral water consumption: The first quantitative study by Zuccarello et al. [Water Research 157 (2019) 365–371]"

Water Research 2019 18 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Barbara E. Oßmann, Darena Schymanski, Natalia P. Ivleva, Dieter Fischer, Franziska Fischer, Gerald Dallmann, Frank Welle

Summary

This commentary critiques a previously published study on microplastics in bottled mineral water, arguing that questionable analytical methods and lack of rigorous contamination controls undermine the study's conclusions and that media amplification of such flawed findings distorts public understanding of microplastic exposure.

Microplastics in food is a relatively new research field with only few studies available so far. Scientists have been pointing out that some of these studies apply questionable analytical methods. Nevertheless, media often use such results to gain attention of the readers. It is therefore of particular significance, that only those scientific studies are published, clearly presenting valid data on the content of microplastics in food. Unfortunately, the study by Zuccarello et al. shows very critical aspects regarding analytical methods used and conclusions made. The applied procedure is not described and, therefore, does not allow any assessment by other groups, which is indispensable prerequisite of any scientific publication. Moreover, the analytical method used for the identification and quantification of microplastic particles - SEM-EDX - is not sound and not validated. Therefore, in our opinion the results on the contamination of bottled mineral water with microplastics published by Zuccarello et al. are more than questionable.

Share this paper