0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Toward the Development and Application of an Environmental Risk Assessment Framework for Microplastic

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 2019 114 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Todd Gouin, Richard A. Becker, Anne‐Gaelle Collot, John W. Davis, Brett E. Howard, Kunifumi Inawaka, Mark A. Lampi, Blanca Serrano Ramòn, Jay Shi, Philipp W. Hopp

Summary

An international multistakeholder symposium brought together scientists from 8 countries to identify key knowledge gaps for environmental risk assessment of microplastics, finding that current data are insufficient to fully evaluate population-level impacts on aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. The resulting framework prioritizes dose-response data, ecological sensitivity, and standardized exposure metrics as critical needs for future microplastic risk assessment.

Emissions of plastic waste to the environment and the subsequent degradation into microplastic particles that have the potential to interact with biological organisms represent a concern for global society. Current understanding of the potential impacts on aquatic and terrestrial population stability and ecosystem structure and function associated with emissions of microplastic particles is limited and insufficient to fully assess environmental risks. Multistakeholder discussions can provide an important element in helping to identify and prioritize key knowledge gaps in assessing potential risks. In the present review, we summarize multistakeholder discussions from a 1-d International Council of Chemical Associations-sponsored symposium, which involved 39 scientists from 8 countries with representatives from academia, industry, and government. Participants were asked to consider the following: discuss the scientific merits and limitations of applying a proposed conceptual environmental risk assessment (ERA) framework for microplastic particles and identify and prioritize major research needs in applying ERA tools for microplastic particles. Multistakeholder consensus was obtained with respect to the interpretation of the current state of the science related to effects and exposure to microplastic particles, which implies that it is unlikely that the presence of microplastic in the environment currently represents a risk. However, the quality and quantity of existing data require substantial improvement before conclusions regarding the potential risks and impacts of microplastic particles can be fully assessed. Research that directly addresses the development and application of methods that strengthen the quality of data should thus be given the highest priority. Activities aimed at supporting the development of and access to standardized reference material were identified as a key research need. Environ Toxicol Chem 2019;38:2087-2100. © 2019 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC.

Share this paper