0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Microbeads—a Case Study in How Public Outrage Fueled the Emergence of New Regulations

Current Pollution Reports 2019 13 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Denice Nelson, Kate Sellers, Stuart Mackenzie, Nadine Weinberg

Summary

Widespread public outrage over microbeads in personal care products drove national bans in several countries, even though microbeads represent a small fraction of total ocean microplastic pollution. This case study illustrates how public perception can shape environmental regulation faster than scientific risk assessment, offering lessons for addressing emerging pollutants like PFAS.

Several country–wide bans have recently been implemented for microbeads, which are a form of microplastics that are found in our oceans. The effect of the ban on reducing the overall quantity of microplastics in our oceans, however, may not be significant. This paper explores the scientific data related to microbeads to evaluate whether an underlying risk or combination of risks led to the ban, what impact public perception and activism had on this issue, and how this case study may be extrapolated to other emerging issues, such as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). In some cases, the strategy for communicating with the public and managing the outrage can be equally as important as the regulatory and technical strategies.

Share this paper