0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

[Removal of Microplastics by Different Treatment Processes in Shanghai Large Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants].

PubMed 2019 32 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Qilong Jia, Qilong Jia, Xin Zhao, Jianfeng Ye, Jianfeng Ye, Qilong Jia, Hao Chen Hao Chen Qilong Jia, Hao Chen Hao Chen Hao Chen Qilong Jia, Qilong Jia, Qilong Jia, Hao Chen Qilong Jia, Qilong Jia, Hao Chen Hao Chen Hao Chen Jianfeng Ye, Xin Zhao, Lei Li, Xin Zhao, Hao Chen Yun-Han Nie, Xin Zhao, Yun-Han Nie, Yun-Han Nie, Yun-Han Nie, Hao Chen Jianfeng Ye, Jianfeng Ye, Jianfeng Ye, Jianfeng Ye, Hao Chen Yun-Han Nie, Jianfeng Ye, Yun-Han Nie, Hao Chen Jianfeng Ye, Hao Chen Jianfeng Ye, Hao Chen Hao Chen

Summary

A study of two large wastewater treatment plants in Shanghai found that microplastic concentrations in incoming sewage were very high, and overall removal efficiency ranged from 63% to 90% depending on treatment processes. Even with high removal rates, large volumes of microplastics are still discharged to waterways daily.

Study Type Environmental

Wastewater treatment plants are important sources of microplastics (MPs) in aquatic environments. The present study was conducted to investigate the number concentration, removal rate, and fate of MPs in two large municipal treatment plants in Shanghai. The MPs number concentration in the influent water of WWTP1 and WWTP2 were (226.27±83.00) piece·L<sup>-1</sup> and (171.89±62.98) piece·L<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. WWTP1 had a MPs removal efficiency of 63.25%, which is slightly higher than that of WWTP2, at 59.84%. The removal efficiency during the primary treatment process of the two sewage treatment plants on MPs accounted for 70%-80% of the whole treatment process. The primary treatment process and secondary treatment process transferred (48.10%±1.62%) and (12.97%±0.05%) of MPs in the sewage to the sludge, respectively. As a whole, (38.82%±1.55%) of MPs in the sewage treatment plants were finally discharged into natural waters, and the remaining (61.18%±1.55%) entered the sludge. This study shows that the removal rate of MPs in Shanghai's municipal treatment plants is low and that after treatment, large amounts still enter the natural waters with the final effluent, which causes significant ecological risks. This study provides basic data of MPs removal and trends of large urban sewage treatment plants in a plain river network area, which can provide reference for further design of MPs removal processes.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper