0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Riverine Microplastic Pollution in the Pearl River Delta, China: Are Modeled Estimates Accurate?

Environmental Science & Technology 2019 230 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Lei Mai Lei Mai Lei Mai Lei Mai Lei Mai Liang‐Ying Liu, Lian‐Jun Bao, Lei Mai Lei Mai Lei Mai Lei Mai Lei Mai Lei Mai Eddy Y. Zeng, Lei Mai Lei Mai Eddy Y. Zeng, Lei Mai Eddy Y. Zeng, Lian‐Jun Bao, Lian‐Jun Bao, Lian‐Jun Bao, Lian‐Jun Bao, Liang‐Ying Liu, Liang‐Ying Liu, Liang‐Ying Liu, Hui He, Hui He, Hui He, Shan-Ni You, Shan-Ni You, Lian‐Jun Bao, Lian‐Jun Bao, Eddy Y. Zeng, Liang‐Ying Liu, Hui He, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Lei Mai Eddy Y. Zeng, Lei Mai Lei Mai Eddy Y. Zeng, Liang‐Ying Liu, Liang‐Ying Liu, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Lei Mai Lei Mai Lian‐Jun Bao, Lei Mai Eddy Y. Zeng, Liang‐Ying Liu, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Liang‐Ying Liu, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Lian‐Jun Bao, Eddy Y. Zeng, Lei Mai Lei Mai Lei Mai Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Liang‐Ying Liu, Liang‐Ying Liu, Liang‐Ying Liu, Liang‐Ying Liu, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Lian‐Jun Bao, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Lei Mai Eddy Y. Zeng, Lei Mai Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Lei Mai Eddy Y. Zeng, Lei Mai Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Lei Mai Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Eddy Y. Zeng, Lei Mai Lei Mai

Summary

Researchers compared field measurements of microplastic loads in Pearl River Delta tributaries with model-based estimates, finding significant discrepancies that suggest current models either underestimate or overestimate emissions depending on assumptions used. Improving model accuracy requires better local emission data and validation against diverse river systems.

Study Type Environmental

Plastic pollution has caused increasing global concern. Currently, model estimates of the riverine plastic inputs to the global oceans based on the concept of Mismanaged Plastic Waste (MPW) varied substantially, and no field measurements of riverine inputs were available. We conducted sampling at the eight major river outlets of the Pearl River Delta, South China with rapid economic growth and urbanization to provide field measured data for fine-tuning modeling results. Floating microplastics (MPs) were collected with a Manta net (mesh size of 0.33 mm) five times during 2018. Microplastic particles (0.3-5.0 mm) widely occurred in all sampling sites. The number and mass concentrations of MPs were in the ranges of 0.005-0.7 particles m<sup>-3</sup> and 0.004-1.28 mg m<sup>-3</sup> and were positively correlated with water discharges. The annual riverine input of MPs from the Pearl River Delta was estimated at 39 billion particles or 66 tons, which converts to 2400-3800 tons of plastic debris based on calculations described in Text S2. These values were substantially below the MPW-based model estimates (91,000-170,000 tons). The large difference between measured and modeling results may have derived from the large uncertainty in the MPW values assigned to the world's countries/regions.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper