0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

Impacts of microplastic vs. natural abiotic particles on the clearance rate of a marine mussel

Limnology and Oceanography Letters 2019 66 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 45 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Lyda S.T. Harris, Lyda S.T. Harris, Lyda S.T. Harris, Lyda S.T. Harris, Emily Carrington Emily Carrington Emily Carrington

Summary

Laboratory experiments compared how mussels responded to microplastics versus natural abiotic particles (sediment, sand) in terms of clearance rate, finding that mussels reduced their filtration activity when exposed to microplastics but not natural particles. This selective behavioral response suggests that microplastics may interfere with the normal filter-feeding of mussels in ways that natural particles do not.

Abstract In coastal habitats, mussels are exposed to microplastics (MP; plastic 0.1 μ m–5 mm) and silt, two abiotic particles that are similarly sized and lack nutrition. The addition of MP or silt may change the functional response of mussels. We measured clearance rate (CR) of Mytilus trossulus in three particle treatments (algae, MP + algae, and silt + algae) across four concentrations to (1) determine if the effects of MP and silt are similar and (2) disentangle the effects of particle type, particle concentration, and proportion of abiotic particles. CR decreased by 62% at high MP concentrations (> 1250 particles mL −1 ) but was not affected at equivalent silt concentrations. These findings suggest high MP concentrations inhibit mussel CR, more than expected by changes in particle concentration or the proportion of abiotic particles. As plastic production increases, mussel exposure to MP will increase, potentially reducing energy transfer, benthic‐pelagic coupling, and water clarity.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper