0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Plastic degradation in aquatic environments: a review of challenges and the need for standardized experimental approaches

Frontiers in Environmental Science 2025 4 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 58 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Jan Halfar, Jan Halfar, Jan Halfar, Kateřina Brožová, Kateřina Brožová, Kateřina Brožová, Kateřina Brožová, Jan Halfar, Silvie Heviánková Jan Halfar, Kateřina Brožová, Silvie Heviánková Jan Halfar, Silvie Heviánková Jan Halfar, Kateřina Brožová, Kateřina Brožová, Jan Halfar, Kristína Čabanová, Kristína Čabanová, Kateřina Brožová, Kateřina Brožová, Kateřina Brožová, Jan Halfar, Kristína Čabanová, Kristína Čabanová, Jan Halfar, Jan Halfar, Kristína Čabanová, Silvie Heviánková Jan Halfar, Silvie Heviánková Kristína Čabanová, Kristína Čabanová, Alice Valigůrová, Alice Valigůrová, Alice Valigůrová, Alice Valigůrová, Alice Valigůrová, Alice Valigůrová, Silvie Heviánková Kateřina Brožová, Silvie Heviánková Silvie Heviánková Silvie Heviánková Silvie Heviánková

Summary

This review analyzed over 100 studies on how plastics degrade in aquatic environments and found that experimental approaches vary widely, making it difficult to compare results across research groups. Researchers identified key inconsistencies in how degradation conditions, measurement techniques, and reporting standards are applied. The study calls for standardized experimental protocols so the scientific community can more reliably predict how plastic waste breaks down into microplastics in real-world water systems.

Plastic pollution has a significant impact on ecosystems, primarily due to the formation of microplastics through degradation processes. The degradation of plastic waste in aquatic systems is a key pathway in the formation of microplastics, yet the experimental approaches used to study these processes remain inconsistent and poorly harmonized. This review encompasses over 100 relevant documents, including experimental studies on plastic degradation under laboratory and field aquatic conditions, as well as reviews, standards, and policy reports that contextualize methodological challenges and ongoing standardization efforts. We identify key sources of methodological variation, including material types, particle sizes, exposure durations, environmental settings, and physical–chemical parameters such as UV radiation and mechanical stress. These discrepancies hinder the comparability of results and limit the development of robust, policy–relevant conclusions. Recent progress, including the ISO 24187:2023 standard for microplastic analysis, highlights steps toward harmonization but also underscores remaining gaps for degradation testing. We highlight specific gaps in current practices and propose essential parameters that require harmonization–particularly in long–term degradation testing and the simulation of realistic aquatic conditions. By addressing these methodological inconsistencies, more reproducible results can be achieved, enabling predictive modelling and supporting evidence–based risk assessment. In turn, standardized protocols will provide a stronger foundation for environmental policy and mitigation strategies aimed at reducing microplastic pollution.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper