0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Climatic and anthropogenic regulation of carbon transport and transformation in a karst river-reservoir system

The Science of The Total Environment 2019 76 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Wanfa Wang, Si‐Liang Li, Jun Zhong, Stephen C. Maberly, Cai Li, Cong‐Qiang Liu Fushun Wang, Huayun Xiao, Cong‐Qiang Liu

Summary

Researchers analyzed dissolved inorganic carbon along a cascade of seven dam reservoirs in a karst river system in southwest China over one hydrological year, finding that cascading dams collectively exert a stronger effect on carbon cycling than single dams, with water temperature and hydraulic retention time jointly controlling how much carbon is retained or transformed.

The effect of dams on dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) transport and riverine ecosystems is unclear in karst cascade reservoirs. Here, we analyzed water samples from a karst river system with seven cascade reservoirs along the Wujiang River, southwestern China, during one hydrological year. From upstream to downstream, the average concentration of DIC increased from 2.2 to 2.6 mmol/L and its carbon isotope composition (δC) decreased from -8.0 to -10‰. Meanwhile, the air temperature (Ta) increased from 20.3 °C to 26.7 °C and 10 °C to 13.7 °C in the warm and cold seasons, respectively. The results suggest that a cascade of dams has a stronger effect on DIC dynamics and retention than a single dam. The good correlation between Ta/HRT (hydraulic retention time) and Δ[DIC] as well as Δ[δC] mean that Ta and HRT affected the magnitude of the damming effect by altering changes in concentration of DIC and δC in the reservoir compared to the inflowing water. In particular, daily regulated reservoirs with short retention times acted more like river corridors and had a smaller effect on carbon dynamics, so modulating retention time might be used reduce the effect of dams on the riverine ecosystem.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper