0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Nanoplastics Remediation Sign in to save

All the small things: How virus‐like particles and liposomes modulate allergic immune responses

European Journal of Immunology 2019 22 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Bernhard Kratzer, Sandra Höfer, Maja Zabel, Winfried F. Pickl

Summary

This review examines how virus-like nanoparticles and liposomes are being engineered as antigen delivery platforms for allergy treatment, discussing their ability to break immunological tolerance against endogenous cytokines and IgE. The authors critically assess the pros and cons of inducing neutralising autoantibodies and review progress toward non-anaphylactogenic particle designs in preclinical and clinical allergy studies.

Body Systems
Study Type In vivo

Recent years have seen a dramatic increase in the range of applications of virus-like nanoparticle (VNP)- and liposome-based antigen delivery systems for the treatment of allergies. These platforms rely on a growing number of inert virus-backbones or distinct lipid formulations and intend to engage the host's innate and/or adaptive immune system by virtue of their co-delivered immunogens. Due to their particulate nature, VNP and liposomal preparations are also capable of breaking tolerance against endogenous cytokines, Igs, and their receptors, allowing for the facile induction of anti-cytokine, anti-IgE, or anti-FcεR antibodies in the host. We here discuss the "pros and cons" of inducing such neutralizing autoantibodies. Moreover, we cover another major theme of the last years, i.e., the engineering of non-anaphylactogenic particles and the elucidation of the parameters relevant for the specific trafficking and processing of such particles in vivo. Finally, we put the various technical advances in VNP- and liposome-research into (pre-)clinical context by referring and critically discussing the relevant studies performed to treat allergic diseases.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

The ancillary effects of nanoparticles and their implications for nanomedicine

Researchers reviewed 'ancillary effects' — the unintended biological interactions between nanoparticles and living systems that occur independent of engineered targeting or therapeutic functions — cataloguing how nanomaterial surface properties can modulate cell signaling, immune responses, and toxicity in ways that have major implications for nanomedicine safety and design.

Article Tier 2

Current Strategies to Modulate Regulatory T Cell Activity in Allergic Inflammation

This review summarized current strategies to modulate regulatory T cell activity in allergic inflammation, covering approaches from allergen immunotherapy to biologics that aim to restore immune tolerance in atopic diseases affecting up to 50% of people in industrialized countries.

Article Tier 2

Nanoparticle-Based Delivery Systems for Vaccines

This review examines how nanoparticle-based delivery systems are improving vaccine effectiveness by enabling precise control over particle size, shape, and surface properties. Researchers found that these nanovaccines address many shortcomings of traditional vaccines, including low immunogenicity and incomplete protection. The study provides an overview of how advances in chemical and biological engineering are enabling more robust immune responses through improved antigen presentation.

Article Tier 2

The quest for nanoparticle-powered vaccines in cancer immunotherapy

This review explores how nanoparticles are being developed as cancer vaccine delivery systems to train the immune system to fight tumors more effectively. While focused on cancer immunotherapy rather than microplastics, the research highlights that understanding how nanoparticles interact with the immune system is crucial -- the same principles apply to understanding how nanoplastics may affect immune responses in the body.

Article Tier 2

In Vitro and In Vivo Models to Assess the Immune-Related Effects of Nanomaterials

This review examines in vitro and in vivo models used to assess the immune effects of nanomaterials, comparing cell line, primary cell, and animal model approaches used by regulatory bodies to evaluate immunosafety of drugs, nanomaterials, and environmental contaminants including nanoplastics.

Share this paper