We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
An easy method for processing and identification of natural and synthetic microfibers and microplastics in indoor and outdoor air
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers developed a simple protocol for identifying airborne microplastics and microfibers using hydrogen peroxide to remove organic matter, sodium iodide density separation to eliminate minerals, and stereomicroscope observation guided by a fiber identification diagram. The method achieved a 94.4% recovery rate from spiked samples and was validated on real indoor and outdoor environmental samples.
Microplastics and microfibers can contaminate every matrix, including in the atmosphere, thus leading to incidental inhalation. However, concentrations of airborne synthetic particle in indoor and outdoor environments are not well understood due to the complexities of sampling, sample processing and identification. This work aims at producing a simple protocol to determine the concentrations of airborne microplastics and fibers. This is accomplished by removing organic matter using hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), followed by removal of mineral matter by density separation with sodium iodide (NaI). Finally, identification of fibers into synthetic or natural under the stereomicroscope can be achieved following a diagram produced by systematically observing the most common textile fibers. This method produces a recovery rate of 94.4 % for spiked samples and has been proven suitable for environmental samples. •Fibers and microplastics in air are easier to identify after carbonaceous matter removal;•No loss of microfiber is expected from the solutions used;•Recovery rates of spiked samples is 94.4 %.
More Papers Like This
Chemometric discrimination of airborne fibres: microplastics, regenerated cellulose and natural fibres
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers measured airborne fiber concentrations across a variety of indoor and outdoor settings and used advanced analytical methods to distinguish between synthetic microplastics, regenerated cellulose, and natural fibers. They found that cellulosic fibers, often overlooked in microplastic surveys, frequently dominated particle counts in many environments. The study highlights the importance of identifying all fiber types in air quality assessments rather than focusing exclusively on synthetic plastics.
Development of a standardized methodology for the identification and characterization of airborne microplastics in working spaces
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers developed a standardized methodology for identifying and characterizing microplastics in both outdoor and indoor atmospheric samples, addressing the absence of harmonized protocols that limits comparability across airborne microplastic studies. The standardized approach improved reproducibility and allowed more accurate assessment of human inhalation exposure in different environments.
Development of a standardized methodology for the identification and characterization of airborne microplastics in working spaces
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers developed a standardized methodology for identifying and characterizing microplastics in both indoor and outdoor atmospheric samples. The protocol addresses the lack of consistent methods for airborne microplastic monitoring, which is important given the high amount of time people spend indoors.
A Juxtaposition of Airborne Microplastics and Fiber Contamination in Various Environments
AI summary Read the abstract
Air samples from five indoor and outdoor locations were analyzed over five months for microplastic and fiber contamination in atmospheric fallout, finding microplastics present at all sites with higher concentrations indoors. The study contributes to understanding airborne microplastic exposure pathways for humans.
Microplastics comparison of indoor and outdoor air and ventilation rate effect in outskirts of the Seoul metropolitan city
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers measured airborne microplastics both indoors and outdoors in buildings near Seoul, finding that indoor concentrations were 1.8 times higher than outdoor levels. Polyester fibers from clothing and furnishings were the most common type, and lower ventilation rates led to higher indoor microplastic levels, meaning the air people breathe at home and work may be a significant source of microplastic exposure.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.