We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Reverse Archaeology: Synthetic Surrogate as Ghosting Object
Summary
This fine arts paper examines how synthetic plastics have been used as surrogates for natural materials in museum conservation and art, and reflects on the irony that these supposedly preservation-oriented substitutes have become persistent environmental pollutants. It engages with the cultural dimensions of plastic's dual legacy as both material innovation and environmental burden.
In the second half of the 20th century, the great technological innovation of synthetic plastic matter as a natural materials surrogate created a major shift in postmodern fine arts as in total civilization. Initially invented to preserve endangered natural resources, overtaking the salvific role, fine arts technologists began to make substitutions and copies of artifacts which needed to speak for the original in their protected absence. For the past several decades it has been scientifically proven that these synthetic masses are not biodegradable. They achieve an aura of endurance and become “super-originals”. Where there is a substitute, a synthetic surrogate, the original is in its absence what I call the “ghosting object”. This principle of the indirect comprehension of life and anthropogenic alternations will deeply influence human communication in general. Living in such a mediated, time-relational reality, one of the tendencies identified and presented here is the reverse archaeology approach— making a past-related artifact from the future. Reverse archaeology is about using fragments of past eras to deduce an image of the vanishing world which produced them and generate a fragment of the world to come.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Plastiglomerates, Microplastics, Nanoplastics
This essay explores the cultural and ecological meaning of plastic pollution through art and speculative design, examining how plastics have become embedded in every environment including the human body. It argues that understanding plastic as part of a 'dark ecology' is essential for rethinking our relationship with synthetic materials.
“The Rejected Remains as Fact”
This paper explores how contemporary artists are responding to the pervasive presence of microplastics and nanoplastics through visual and performative works. Researchers examine how art projects have shifted from environmental alarm toward speculative scenarios of plastic-human coexistence, drawing on the concept of the plastisphere. The study suggests that artistic investigations can reframe our understanding of plastic pollution by exploring cultural and material dimensions beyond purely scientific perspectives.
Waste Journeys
This multidisciplinary study examined plastic waste as a material of the Anthropocene by tracing the journeys of plastic objects across cultural, natural, marine, and terrestrial landscapes, exploring how plastic's resilience makes it a defining and problematic artifact of modern civilization.
The Art of (Up)Recycling: How Plastic Debris Has Become a Matter of Art?
This art and culture paper examines how contemporary artists have used plastic waste as a medium, exploring how art can communicate environmental concerns about plastic pollution to the public. The work documents artistic responses to the global plastic crisis. While not a scientific study, art-based approaches are relevant to raising public awareness about microplastic contamination and motivating behavioral change.
Plastic Humanities: Revaluing Humanistic Inquiry in the Plastic Age
This humanities essay argued for the value of humanistic inquiry in addressing the environmental and cultural consequences of the 'Plastic Age,' proposing the concept of 'plastic humanities' as an interdisciplinary framework. The work makes the case that understanding plastics' social and cultural dimensions is essential alongside scientific approaches.