We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Can Plant- and Cell-Based Seafood Improve Human and Planetary Health?: An examination of the environmental, social and economic costs and benefits of seafood alternatives
Summary
This white paper reviews the potential environmental, social, and health benefits and drawbacks of plant-based and cell-based seafood alternatives compared to wild-caught fish and conventional aquaculture. The relevance to microplastics lies in the fact that farmed and wild seafood are increasingly contaminated with plastic particles.
This white paper, which is based on information and insight gleaned from the workshop as well expert interviews and a literature review, provides a preliminary examination of market trends and the potential environmental, socio-economic, and human health costs and benefits of plant- and cell-based seafood relative to wild capture fisheries and aquaculture. As plant- and cell-based seafood alternatives are still in their infancy, there remain a lot of untested assumptions, unanswered questions and opportunities for further research, inquiry and collaboration. Indeed, there are research, funding, governance and capacity gaps that present obstacles to understanding, comparing, developing and scaling plant- and cell-based seafood alternatives. Still, diversification of our food system to include new modes of sustainable, healthy and socially responsible seafood production is needed to mitigate risk and to feed a growing global population. Whether seafood alternatives can meet this need, and whether they will supplement or displace conventional seafood products in the marketplace, will be a function of many factors, not the least of which is product alignment with consumer values and expectations around taste and texture, cost parity, and accessibility. The findings and conclusions stated in this white paper, commissioned by the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), are those of Meghan Jeans, and not necessarily WCS. WCS does not recommend or endorse any plant-based or cell-based seafood or other commercial products mentioned in the white paper.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Cell-cultivated aquatic food products: emerging production systems for seafood
This review examines cell-cultivated seafood, a new approach to producing fish protein by growing fish cells in a lab rather than catching or farming fish. One potential benefit is avoiding the microplastic contamination found in wild and farmed fish, since the production environment can be controlled. As concerns grow about microplastics accumulating in seafood, lab-grown alternatives could offer a way to reduce human exposure to microplastics through diet.
Effects of marine microplastic on marine life and the food webs – A detailed review
This review provides a comprehensive look at microplastic pollution in marine environments, covering sources, impacts on marine life, and risks to human health through the seafood supply chain. Microplastics cause physical harm like gut blockages in marine animals and can carry toxic chemicals that accumulate up the food chain. The authors emphasize that with global plastic production still rising, urgent policy action and better waste management are needed to protect both ocean ecosystems and human health.
Expanded utilisation of microalgae in global aquafeeds
This review explores how microalgae can be used more widely in aquaculture feeds as a sustainable replacement for fish meal and fish oil. Microalgae provide essential fatty acids, proteins, vitamins, and antioxidant pigments that support fish health and growth. While not directly about microplastics, expanding microalgae-based aquaculture feeds could reduce reliance on wild-caught fish from potentially microplastic-contaminated oceans.
In-depth analysis of microplastics reported from animal and algae seafood species: Implications for consumers and environmental health
Researchers analyzed microplastic contamination in several seafood species and algae from the Bay of Biscay in Spain and estimated how much people might consume through their diet. They found that eating animal-based seafood carried a higher risk of microplastic ingestion than eating seaweed. The findings highlight that seafood is a meaningful source of human microplastic exposure, with implications for both consumer and environmental health.
Microplastics in coastal and marine environments: A critical issue of plastic pollution on marine organisms, seafood contaminations, and human health implications
This review highlights the serious threat microplastics pose to marine life and the millions of people who depend on seafood as a primary protein source. Marine organisms, especially filter-feeders like oysters and mussels, accumulate microplastics that can cause tissue damage, oxidative stress, immune changes, and behavioral problems. Since these shellfish are often eaten raw, any toxins they accumulate -- including microplastics -- pass directly to humans.