0
Article Tier 2 Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Power to the individual : a case study of a Dutch NGO and its strategy to fight plastic pollution

AI summary Read the abstract

This political science case study examines the strategy of a Dutch environmental NGO working to reduce plastic pollution in waterways and the ocean, focusing on its approach to mobilizing individual behavior change as a lever for systemic social change. Researchers assessed the effectiveness of the individual-empowerment strategy relative to more systemic governance approaches. This is a governance and NGO strategy study with no direct connection to microplastic science.

Study Type Environmental

The impact of plastic on the environment has been acknowledged on different levels, among others various NGOs around the world. These NGOs are known to aim for a reduction of plastic ending up in nature and more specifically the ocean. Plastic has been instrumental to the development of modern societies since the 1950s as the properties of the material enables it to be used for various purposes. This dependency on plastic demonstrates the need for social change in order to reduce the amount of plastic entering the ocean. Therefore, it is crucial for NGOs to adopt a strategy that supports social change. Since NGOs are likely to perceive individuals as the agent of change, identifying how individuals can contribute to social change and how NGOs can encourage this, can be relevant in the fight against plastic pollution. In this thesis a Dutch NGO’s strategy and the execution of this strategy is analysed through semi-structured interviews and textual social media posts. The analysis has been guided by the theoretical concepts of hegemony and different forms of power. It has demonstrated the NGO’s awareness of the structural connotations of plastic pollution. Nevertheless, their strategy shows a strong focus on changes within the private sphere and a strategy relying on education and creating awareness. The former can be recognized as the reinforcement of the hegemonic discourse on individualized responsibility, preventing plastic manufacturers and companies to be forced to act. The latter indicates a lack of understanding of the structural challenges that individuals face in avoiding plastic. The discussion includes the acknowledgement that changes within the private sphere are necessary. However, rather focusing on these changes alone, a recommendation is given to introduce alternative approaches for individuals to create social change.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

The acceleration of small wins to contribute to the problem of plastic pollution. A case study of Dutch initiatives contributing to plastic free waterways.

AI summary Read the abstract

This governance thesis examines how small-win strategies can be applied to address plastic pollution in Dutch waterways, using bottom-up incremental change theory to analyze existing initiatives targeting plastic-free waterways. Researchers identified propelling mechanisms that enable consecutive small successes to aggregate toward larger sustainability outcomes. The study contributes governance insights applicable to plastic pollution reduction efforts at local and national scales.

Article Tier 2

Taking Action against the Rising Tide of Marine Plastic Pollution. A Case Study of the Surfrider Foundation.

AI summary Read the abstract

This thesis analyzes marine plastic pollution as a complex policy problem and examines how NGOs like the Surfrider Foundation mobilize public action and advocate for regulatory change. The work highlights both the structural drivers of single-use plastic culture and the strategies that civil society groups use to counter it.

Systematic Review Tier 1

A systematic literature review of voluntary behaviour change approaches in single use plastic reduction

AI summary Read the abstract

This systematic review examines efforts to voluntarily reduce single-use plastic consumption through behavior change rather than legislation. The research finds that while government bans on plastics are effective, voluntary approaches that respect individual choice can also make a difference. Understanding what motivates people to reduce plastic use is key to tackling the microplastic pollution problem at its source.

Article Tier 2

On the way to reduce marine microplastics pollution. Research landscape of psychosocial drivers

AI summary Read the abstract

A review of psychosocial drivers of marine plastic pollution found that factors including consumer convenience preferences, low perceived personal responsibility, and weak norm activation explain why behavioral change around plastic use is slow, and that interventions combining social norms messaging with structural changes show the most promise.

Article Tier 2

Corporate responsibility to curb microplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

This study investigated the psychosocial factors that influence corporate willingness to take responsibility for reducing microplastic emissions, drawing on behavioral science to understand why companies act — or fail to act — on plastic pollution. Key factors identified included perceived social norms, corporate identity, and regulatory pressure. The study suggests that combining public pressure, industry benchmarking, and regulatory frameworks could be effective in motivating corporate behavior change around microplastic pollution.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper