0
Article Tier 2 Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Sharing = multiplying? Exciting times for sociology

2025

AI summary Read the abstract

This sociological commentary argues that three forms of 'sharing' - multidisciplinary collaboration, joint data use, and evidence-informed policy advice - offer exciting opportunities for sociology to better understand complex social issues. The author cites microplastics as one of several policy areas where incorporating a sociological perspective has proven crucial to generating meaningful scientific and regulatory insights.

At present, sociologists have exciting opportunities to gain an even better understanding of complex social issues. I describe three of these opportunities using the concept of ‘sharing’. I also address the question of whether that sharing involves ‘multiplication’. The first form of sharing is through multidisciplinary collaboration. Such collaboration requires complicated communicative, relational, and substantive efforts. If there is a foundation of trust, these efforts can generate innovative scientific returns in addition to collateral happiness. The second form of sharing involves the joint use of data. Access to large-scale data and computational methods enables a renewal of the research agenda, while access to government data increases the possibilities to underpin policy with empirical knowledge. The third form of sharing materializes in evidence-informed policy advice. The effectiveness of scientific advice is greater if policymakers and scientific experts engage in deliberative dialogue over the course of the advisory process. For a variety of topics, such as food from the oceans, microplastics, car emissions, plant protection products, cybersecurity, and pandemic preparedness, the incorporation of a sociological perspective has been crucial.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Next steps for research on society and microplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

This perspective paper assessed the contributions of social and behavioral sciences to microplastics research, covering policy analysis, public education, and stakeholder engagement. The authors argue for greater integration of social science methods to understand and reduce plastic pollution at the human systems level.

Article Tier 2

Next steps for research on society and microplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

This perspective paper outlined priority directions for social and behavioral science research on microplastics, building on the established contributions of social sciences to understanding policy, stakeholder views, and public behavior around plastic pollution. The authors called for greater integration of social science methods to address governance gaps and support effective microplastic management.

Article

Societal Awareness, Regulatory Framework, and Technical Guidelines for Management of Plastic Wastes

AI summary Read the abstract

This review examines the social and governance dimensions of plastic waste management, arguing that sustainable outcomes require integrating sociological perspectives — including public awareness, institutional frameworks, and regulatory standards — alongside technical approaches to reduce global plastic pollution.

Article Tier 2

The concept of plasticology

AI summary Read the abstract

This conceptual paper introduces "plasticology" as a proposed interdisciplinary field that integrates the natural sciences, social sciences, and arts to study the full relationship between humans and synthetic plastics in the environment. The authors argue that microplastic and nanoplastic research must include social dimensions — such as behavior patterns and public awareness — alongside chemistry, ecotoxicology, and environmental science to fully understand and address plastic pollution. They highlight art-science collaboration as a potentially valuable tool for building public awareness and monitoring societal responses to plastic contamination.

Review

Transdisciplinary pragmatic melioration for the plastic life cycle: Why the social, natural, and technical sciences should prioritize reducing harm

AI summary Read the abstract

This review argues that solving the global plastic waste crisis requires a transdisciplinary approach integrating natural sciences, engineering, and social sciences focused on pragmatic harm reduction across the full plastic lifecycle, rather than siloed technical research that overlooks social contexts and systemic inequities in waste management.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper