0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Sign in to save

US plastics and recycling troubles will worsen

Emerald expert briefings 2020 Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.

Summary

This commentary critiques U.S. plastics legislation for studying the problem rather than committing to meaningful policy action. The author warns that microplastic proliferation will continue with uncertain health consequences, and that a change in administration would likely further delay federal efforts to address plastic waste.

Significance The bill contains pledges to study the problem of plastics needs versus environmental risks posed, but few solid commitments to policy change adequate to meet the plastics waste crisis, either for the United States or globally. Impacts Proliferation of microplastics will continue, with as yet uncertain science available on their health impacts. If Donald Trump wins the 2020 election, any federal action on plastics mitigation is even less likely. More countries will consider limiting or refusing to import other countries’ waste In countries that once exported waste, demand will grow for new home-grown waste-management, including enhanced recycling.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Tiny pollutants, big changes: Progress in microplastics research and U.S. policy

This commentary reviewed the current state of U.S. federal policy on microplastic pollution, noting that legislation is largely limited to banning microbeads in personal care products and monitoring plastics in food and water. The authors argued that developing evidence-based national policies will require substantially more research on human health impacts.

Article Tier 2

The United States requires effective federal policy to reduce marine plastic pollution

This study argued that the United States lacks effective federal policy to address marine plastic pollution, examining gaps in regulation of single-use plastics and fishing nets and calling for comprehensive federal legislation given that the U.S. ranks among the top 20 countries for mismanaged plastic waste entering the ocean.

Article Tier 2

Plastic waste as a challenge for sustainable development and circularity in the European Union

This review examines the plastic waste crisis in the European Union, evaluating gaps between recycling policy ambitions and actual outcomes. It argues that without major improvements in waste management infrastructure and circular economy practices, plastics will continue to fragment into microplastics and contaminate European ecosystems.

Article Tier 2

Look before you leap: Are increased recycling efforts accelerating microplastic pollution?

Researchers argue that current policies pushing for more plastic recycling may actually increase microplastic pollution, because degraded recyclate is used in more products and applications where it breaks down more easily. They propose a risk framework for evaluating how recycled plastics shed microplastics throughout their lifecycle — from production to disposal — and flag textiles and wood-plastic composites as high-concern areas.

Article Tier 2

Micro-consumerist bollocks in the fight against plastic pollution: when good intentions - and regulatory initiatives - go awry

This commentary critiques individual-level consumer actions as insufficient responses to plastic pollution, arguing that regulatory initiatives focused on micro-consumerism have very limited impact on the scale of plastic contamination. The authors call for systemic policy changes targeting production and industrial waste rather than consumer behavior.

Share this paper