Rapid Assessment of Floating Macroplastic Transport in the Rhine
Frontiers in Marine Science2020
109 citations
?
Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Score: 40
?
0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Merel Kooi,
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Paul Vriend,
Paul Vriend,
Paul Vriend,
Paul Vriend,
Paul Vriend,
Paul Vriend,
Paul Vriend,
Paul Vriend,
Merel Kooi,
Merel Kooi,
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Merel Kooi,
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Merel Kooi,
Merel Kooi,
Merel Kooi,
Tim van Emmerik
Merel Kooi,
Tim van Emmerik
Merel Kooi,
Merel Kooi,
Merel Kooi,
Merel Kooi,
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Merel Kooi,
Caroline van Calcar,
Paul Vriend,
Merel Kooi,
Merel Kooi,
Merel Kooi,
Tim van Emmerik
Paul Vriend,
Paul Vriend,
Paul Vriend,
Paul Vriend,
Tim van Emmerik
Merel Kooi,
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Merel Kooi,
Caroline van Calcar,
Merel Kooi,
Merel Kooi,
Tim van Emmerik
Paul Vriend,
Tim van Emmerik
Paul Vriend,
Merel Kooi,
Tim van Emmerik
Merel Kooi,
Merel Kooi,
Tim van Emmerik
Merel Kooi,
Tim van Emmerik
Merel Kooi,
Paul Vriend,
Tim van Emmerik
Merel Kooi,
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Merel Kooi,
Merel Kooi,
Merel Kooi,
Merel Kooi,
Paul Vriend,
Paul Vriend,
Harm Landman,
Harm Landman,
Remco Pikaar,
Remco Pikaar,
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Merel Kooi,
Paul Vriend,
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Paul Vriend,
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Paul Vriend,
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Merel Kooi,
Merel Kooi,
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Summary
Researchers developed a rapid assessment methodology to quantify floating macroplastic transport in the Rhine River using visual counting from bridges combined with flow velocity data, demonstrating the feasibility of low-cost monitoring approaches for riverine plastic flux. The study contributes to better understanding of how rivers function as pathways delivering plastic pollution to the ocean.
Study Type
Environmental
Most marine litter pollution is assumed to originate from land-based sources, entering the marine environment through rivers. To better understand and quantify the risk that plastic pollution poses on aquatic ecosystems, and to develop effective prevention and mitigation methods, a better understanding of riverine plastic transport is needed. To achieve this, quantification of riverine plastic transport is crucial. Here, we demonstrate how established methods can be combined to provide a rapid and cost-effective characterization and quantification of floating macroplastic transport in the River Rhine We combine visual observations with passive sampling to arrive at a first-order estimate of macroplastic transport, both in number (10 - 75 items per hour) and mass per unit of time (1.3 – 9.7 kg per day). Additionally, our assessment gives insight in the most abundant macroplastic polymer types the downstream reach of the River Rhine. Furthermore, we explore the spatial and temporal variation of plastic transport within the river, and discuss the benefits and drawbacks of current sampling methods. Finally, we present an outlook for future monitoring of major rivers, including several suggestions on how to expand the rapid assessment presented in this paper.