0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Sign in to save

Environmental micropaint: a primary review of sampling techniques and analytical approaches

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2025 Score: 38 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Farnaz Tadayon, Maryam Saemi-Komsari, Sajjad Abbasi

Summary

This review synthesizes findings from 74 studies on micropaint particles, a class of environmental contaminants distinct from conventional microplastics that originate from degradation of coated surfaces and antifouling paints, and are enriched with heavy metals and biocidal additives. The authors identify critical gaps in standardized sampling protocols, analytical methods for differentiating micropaints from microplastics, and knowledge of their ecotoxicological effects particularly in coastal zones.

Paint particles, commonly referred to as micropaints, represent an emerging yet underexplored class of environmental contaminants, distinct from conventional microplastics in terms of origin, composition, and ecological risk. Predominantly sources from the degradation of coated surfaces and antifouling paints, micropaints are enriched with Heavy metals and biocidal additives, posing unique environmental and toxicological threats. This review provides a comprehensive assessment of micropaints, focusing on their occurrence across aquatic, terrestrial, and atmospheric systems, and critically examines sampling strategies and analytical methodologies applied in recent studies. We synthesize findings from 74 original research articles, highlighting key sampling techniques tailored to diverse environmental matrices including sediments, soils, biota, dust, and water. Special emphasis is placed on the limitations of current pre-treatment procedures, analytical challenges in differentiating micropaints from microplastics, and the need for standardized protocols. Additionally, we discuss the environmental pathways, bioaccumulation potential, and ecotoxicological effects of micropaints, particularly in coastal zones affected by antifouling paints. This review identifies critical knowledge gaps and offers recommendations for future research to better understand the environmental fate, risks, and regulatory implications of micropaint pollution.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Critical review of analytical methods for antifouling paint particles in marine systems

This review critically examines the sources, sampling strategies, and analytical methods used to detect and quantify antifouling paint particles in marine environments. Researchers found that while recent studies have begun characterizing these particles, the methods used lack standardization and consistency. The study calls for the development of harmonized protocols to better assess the environmental prevalence and toxicity of paint-derived microparticles in the ocean.

Article Tier 2

Paint particle pollution in aquatic environments: Current advances and analytical challenges

This review highlights paint particles as an overlooked but significant source of microplastic pollution in water environments, originating from marine vessels, buildings, and industrial activities. Paint particles carry toxic chemicals including heavy metals and biocides that can leach into water and accumulate in marine organisms, posing risks to both ecosystems and human health through seafood consumption.

Article Tier 2

The potential release of microplastics from paint fragments: Characterizing sources, occurrence and ecological impacts

This review examines paint fragments as a significant but often overlooked source of microplastic pollution, coming from deteriorating building coatings, road markings, and ship hulls. Beyond the plastic particles themselves, paint fragments can release toxic biocides and heavy metals that harm aquatic and terrestrial organisms. The findings highlight paint as a source of microplastics that people may encounter through water, air, and food, but which receives far less attention than packaging or textile sources.

Article Tier 2

Environmental pollution with antifouling paint particles: Distribution, ecotoxicology, and sustainable alternatives

This review examines antifouling paint particles as a type of microplastic pollution loaded with toxic biocidal compounds in the marine environment. Researchers found that these particles are mainly concentrated around boatyards and port areas and contribute significantly to overall microplastic pollution, while also discussing recent advances in nontoxic, biobased antifouling alternatives.

Article Tier 2

Paint: a ubiquitous yet disregarded piece of the microplastics puzzle

This review found that microplastics from paint and coatings are a largely overlooked but major source of plastic pollution, with concentrations reaching up to 290,000 particles per kilogram of sediment near painted surfaces. Paint microplastics come from buildings, cars, boats, and industrial infrastructure. Of the toxic effects tested, 66% showed significant harm to organisms, particularly from antifouling paints, yet very few studies have examined this pollution source.

Share this paper