0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Sign in to save

Driven by speculation, not by impact – the effects of plastic on fish species

Journal of Fish Biology 2020 15 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Eoghan M. Cunningham, Kostas Kiriakoulakis, Jaimie T. A. Dick, Louise Kregting, Pia Schuchert, Julia D. Sigwart

Summary

This review critically evaluates evidence for plastic pollution impacts on fish, arguing that many claims in the scientific literature are speculative and not firmly supported by current data. It calls for more rigorous experimental designs and realistic exposure concentrations before drawing conclusions about risks to fish populations.

Plastic products have facilitated the daily lives of an exponentially increasing world population for over 70 years, whilst inadvertently creating one of the most topical environmental issues of the 21 st Century: the plastic pollution crisis. Since the mid-20 th Century, plastic production has expanded continuously to global production levels of over 350 million tons in 2018 (Thompson et al. 2009; Plastics Europe, 2019). Articles surrounding the presence and impacts of plastic pollution on aquatic animals including fish species have become a regular occurrence on media platforms (Kramm et al. 2018) and scientific publications (Henderson & Green, 2020); however, while iconic pictures of individual fish and other taxa with variously attached or ingested plastics might make headlines, they do not of themselves prove impacts, absolute or relative, at population levels.

Share this paper