0
Article Tier 2 Detection Methods Environmental Sources Food & Water Marine & Wildlife Remediation Sign in to save

All that glitters is not plastic: the case of open-ocean fibres

2020

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers analyzed open-ocean textile fibers and found that a significant proportion are not synthetic plastics but rather natural fibers such as cotton and wool, challenging the assumption that all environmental fibers constitute microplastic pollution. This study calls for more precise characterization of fiber types in environmental monitoring to accurately assess plastic versus non-plastic contamination.

Study Type Environmental

Textile fibres are ubiquitous contaminants of emerging concern. Traditionally ascribed to the ’microplastics’ family, their widespread occurrence in the natural environment is commonly reported in plastic pollution studies, with the misleading belief that they largely derive from wear and tear of synthetic fabrics. Their synthetic nature has been largely used to motivate their persistence in the environment, thus explaining their presence in virtually all compartments of the planet, including sea-ice, deep-seas, soils, atmospheric fall-out, foods and drinks. As of today however, an extensive characterization of their polymeric composition has never been performed, even though the evidence that most of these fibres are not synthetic, is slowly emerging. By compiling a dataset of more than 916 seawater samples collected in six different ocean basins, we confirm that microfibres are ubiquitous in the world seas, but mainly composed of natural polymers. The chemical characterization of almost 2000 fibres through µFTIR techniques revealed that in striking contrast to global production patterns, only 8.2% of marine fibres are actually synthetic, with the rest being predominantly of animal (12.3%) or vegetal origin (79.5%). These results demonstrate the widespread occurrence of cellulosic fibres in the marine environment, emphasizing the need for full chemical identification of these particles, before classifying them as microplastics. On the basis of our findings it appears critical to assess origins, impacts and degradation times of cellulosic fibers in the marine environment, as well as to assess the wider implications of a global overestimation of microplastic loads in natural ecosystems.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Microfibers in the ocean: are they all made of plastic?

AI summary Read the abstract

This science communication piece highlights that the vast majority of tiny fibres found in ocean samples are actually natural materials like cotton and wool, not plastic — challenging widespread assumptions in microplastic research. The author argues that better fibre characterisation is needed to accurately assess the plastic component of textile pollution.

Article Tier 2

When microplastics are not plastic: Chemical characterization of environmental microfibers using stimulated Raman microspectroscopy

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers used advanced Raman microscopy to determine whether microfibers found in various marine environments are actually made of plastic. They found that roughly three-quarters of environmental microfibers are natural materials like cotton or cellulose rather than synthetic polymers. The study suggests that many previous estimates of microplastic fiber pollution may have significantly overcounted by misidentifying natural fibers as plastic.

Article Tier 2

Microfibers in oceanic surface waters: A global characterization

AI summary Read the abstract

A global analysis of 916 seawater samples from six ocean basins characterized microfibers as ubiquitous contaminants, finding that many are not synthetic textiles but natural or semi-synthetic materials, questioning the assumption that all environmental fibers are microplastic.

Article Tier 2

Marine environment microfiber contamination: Global patterns and the diversity of microparticle origins

AI summary Read the abstract

Global patterns of microfiber contamination in the marine environment were reviewed, documenting that synthetic and non-synthetic fibers are found in all major ocean basins, with fibers being the most common microplastic type along shorelines. The review highlights that non-synthetic and semi-synthetic fibers are frequently overlooked in monitoring despite being a significant component of total microfiber pollution.

Article Tier 2

Marine environment microfiber contamination: Global patterns and the diversity of microparticle origins

AI summary Read the abstract

This review examines microfiber contamination in marine environments globally, noting that both synthetic and non-synthetic fibers are common pollutants but that non-synthetic fibers are routinely undercounted in studies. The authors argue that focusing only on synthetic microplastics understates the true scale of microparticle pollution entering the ocean.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper