We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Legacy additives in a circular economy of plastics: Current dilemma, policy analysis, and emerging countermeasures
AI summary Read the abstract
This review analyzed the challenges posed by legacy chemical additives such as flame retardants and plasticizers in achieving a circular economy for plastics. Researchers found that recycling plastics containing these now-restricted or banned substances creates a dilemma, as hazardous additives can be reintroduced into new products, and the study discussed emerging countermeasures to address this problem.
Plastics are widely used because of their diverse mechanical and physicochemical properties, however, many plastic products can only achieve their specific characteristics if mixed with additives, like flame retardants, stabilizers, and plasticizers. Some of the formerly used plastic additives, however, are in the meantime evaluated as substances of very high concern (SVHC) or even persistent organic pollutants (POP) and are referred to as “legacy additives”. Therefore, the improper disposal of legacy plastic waste as well as the recycling and reuse of such can lead to continuous circulation of harmful additives into the environment, threatening plant and animal life, and human health. The environmental threats posed by hazardous additives have been addressed by international regulations like the Registration, Evaluation, and Authorization of Chemicals (REACH) regulation and the Stockholm Convention. They set thresholds for hazardous chemicals including some legacy additives, which regulate trading and waste management, and aim at a fast phase out of hazardous compounds. At the same time, governmental, non-governmental and industrial players support a circular economy of goods including plastics, which resulted and will further result in increasing recycling quotas for waste plastics. When it comes to plastics containing legacy additives a conflict of objectives may arise, namely saving polymeric resources versus phase-out of hazardous compounds. This review paper discusses legacy additives in plastic waste streams, their end-of-life treatment options related to legislation covering these additives and links between regulation and waste management.
More Papers Like This
Legacy additives in a circular economy of plastics: Current dilemma, policy analysis, and emerging countermeasures
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines the problem of 'legacy additives' in plastic waste — formerly used substances such as certain flame retardants, stabilizers, and plasticizers now classified as substances of very high concern or persistent organic pollutants — and analyzes the policy and practical challenges they pose for circular economy recycling and reuse systems. The authors evaluate emerging countermeasures to prevent legacy additive contamination from re-entering product supply chains.
Plastic additives and microplastics as emerging contaminants: Mechanisms and analytical assessment
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers reviewed how chemical additives mixed into plastics during manufacturing — including stabilizers, flame retardants, and plasticizers — can leach out throughout a plastic's lifecycle and pose risks to ecosystems and human health, with microplastics acting as carriers that concentrate and transport these hazardous chemicals.
Addressing the toxic chemicals problem in plastics recycling
AI summary Read the abstract
This study highlights the challenge of toxic chemicals in plastics recycling, noting that plastics contain hundreds of different chemicals including plasticizers, stabilizers, and pigments, many of which are hazardous. Researchers found that because the chemical composition of plastic waste is largely unknown, recyclers cannot effectively screen out materials containing dangerous substances. The authors propose five policy strategies, including improved chemical transparency, simplified regulations, and economic incentives, to make plastics recycling safer.
Plastic circularity: Challenges, opportunities, and future pathways
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines the barriers to a circular plastic economy, concluding that mechanical recycling alone is insufficient and nearing its technical limits, while advanced methods such as chemical depolymerization and dissolution recycling face high costs and market underdevelopment, requiring coordinated regulatory, design, and infrastructure changes to close the recycling gap.
PAH and POP Presence in Plastic Waste and Recyclates: State of the Art
AI summary Read the abstract
This review examines the presence of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and persistent organic pollutants including brominated flame retardants, pesticides, and dioxins in plastic waste and recyclates. The authors conclude that chemical contamination in recycled plastics poses a significant challenge to achieving a safe circular economy for plastics.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.