We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Spatial arrangement of biogenic reefs alters boundary layer characteristics to increase risk of microplastic bioaccumulation
Summary
Flume experiments showed that mussels in clumped reef arrangements experienced 3-fold greater microplastic ingestion than solitary mussels under fast flow conditions, because clumped reefs reduce boundary layer velocity and increase turbulence that retains particles. The findings suggest that natural reef architecture creates microplastic hotspots, making mussel reefs both vulnerable to contamination and potentially useful as pollution bioindicators.
Abstract Microplastics are now synonymous with human impacts on the environment and as a threat to marine organisms. Numerous taxa are at risk from microplastics including commercially valuable bivalves as seafood, which are also disproportionately important as biogenic reef-forming species that enhance biodiversity such that they are commonly protected under conservation actions. As a sessile filter-feeding organism, bivalves are highly susceptible to microplastic ingestion but despite their socio-economic and ecological importance, no research has been undertaken to assess how a reef’s structural arrangement might affect plastic ingestion. Here, using a series of flume experiments, we examined how change in spatial arrangement of the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis , interacts with different flow speeds to effect retention of microplastic over reef surfaces and ingestion risk by individual mussels. Our results show that clumped spatial arrangements reduce boundary layer velocities, and increase turbulence, boundary layer thickness and plastic retention over reef surfaces under faster flow conditions, increasing plastic ingestion by 3-fold. Our findings suggest that the structural arrangement and rugosity of natural reef structures may create natural sinks of anthropogenic pollution, and species like Mytilus that are also important species for human consumption, while disproportionately susceptible to microplastic pollution, may be useful bioindicators of microplastic pollution.