We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Lessons learned from an intercalibration exercise on the quantification and characterisation of microplastic particles in sediment and water samples
AI summary Read the abstract
An intercalibration exercise among five European laboratories showed that errors in counting microplastics in sediment and water samples were generally under 25%, but significant differences existed depending on particle type. The study identified that particle loss during analysis is a bigger problem than contamination, and calls for standardized international methods.
An intercalibration exercise on the characterisation of microplastics in marine sediment and water samples was carried out among five laboratories involved in the implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) in their country. The samples were prepared by mixing cleaned natural sediment and sea water with microplastics sets made of particles of various polymers, shapes and colours. Overall, the errors on total counts were under 25% in absolute value. The risk of non-detection and loss of particles is greater than the risk of contamination during sample analysis. Significant differences are observed among particle types. It appears difficult to obtain reliable and comparable data on the colour of microplastics. A comparison of the errors with regards to the protocols used led to recommend NaCl [1.2 g/cm] density separation for sediment and one filtering step (200 μm). The operators' experience appears as a key factor for the quality of the results.
More Papers Like This
Intra-Laboratory Calibration Exercise for Quantification of Microplastic Particles in Fine-Grained Sediment Samples: Special Focus on the Influence of User Experience
AI summary Read the abstract
An intra-laboratory calibration study assessed how accurately different analysts quantify microplastics in marine sediment samples. Recovery rates and particle identification varied significantly between analysts, especially for small and transparent particles. The study recommends standardized training and protocols to reduce variability and improve the reliability of microplastic quantification in sediments.
Monitoring microplastics in drinking water: An interlaboratory study to inform effective methods for quantifying and characterizing microplastics
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers conducted an interlaboratory study with 22 labs from six countries to evaluate methods for quantifying microplastics in drinking water, finding significant variability between labs and identifying key areas for method standardization.
Interlaboratory Comparison Reveals State of the Art in Microplastic Detection and Quantification Methods
AI summary Read the abstract
This large international study compared how 84 laboratories around the world performed when identifying and measuring microplastics using five common detection methods. The results showed significant differences between labs, with spectroscopy-based methods generally outperforming heat-based techniques for accuracy. The findings highlight that standardized methods are urgently needed so that microplastic measurements in food, water, and the environment can be reliably compared across studies.
Interlaboratory Comparison Reveals State of the Art in Microplastic Detection and Quantification Methods
AI summary Read the abstract
An 84-laboratory interlaboratory comparison tested the accuracy of five established microplastic detection methods using standardized reference materials, revealing significant variability in results across labs and methods. The study highlights that standardization and harmonization of analytical procedures are urgently needed before microplastic measurement can be reliably compared across research groups.
Assessment of microplastic content in natural waters and sediments: sampling and sample preparation
AI summary Read the abstract
Researchers reviewed and evaluated sampling and analytical methods for measuring microplastic content in natural waters and sediments, assessing sources of error and variability in current approaches. The review recommended a standardized protocol to improve cross-study comparability.
Research digests by email
When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.