We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Algal growth at environmentally relevant concentrations of suspended solids: implications for microplastic hazard assessment
Summary
This study tested whether microplastic particles inhibit algae growth compared to natural sediment particles at environmentally relevant concentrations, finding that turbidity from any suspended solids — not just plastic — affects algae. The finding highlights the need to use appropriate reference materials when assessing microplastic toxicity.
Abstract Hazard assessment of microplastic is challenging because standard toxicity testing is mostly developed for soluble (at least partially) chemicals. Adverse effects can occur when test organisms are exposed to turbid environments with various particulate matter (PM), both natural, such as sediment, and anthropogenic, such as microplastic. It is, therefore, relevant to compare responses to PM exposure between the microplastic and other suspended solids present at ecologically relevant concentrations; this can be done by using reference materials when assessing hazard potential of microplastics. Here, we evaluated growth inhibition in unicellular alga Raphidocelis subcapitata exposed to different suspended solids (microplastic, kaolin, and cellulose; 10, 100 and 1000 mg/L) during 72 h; algae without added solids were used as a control. In addition, aggregate formation in the exposure systems was analyzed using particle size distribution data. At 10 and 100 mg/L, no adverse growth effects were observed in any treatments; moreover, algal growth was significantly stimulated in kaolin and cellulose treatments compared to the control. However, at 1000 mg/L, all tested materials exerted growth inhibition, with no significant differences among the treatments. The comparison among particle size distributions across the treatments showed that both PM concentration and size of the particle aggregates were significant growth predictors for all materials tested. Therefore, at high concentrations, both natural and anthropogenic materials have similar capacity to cause adverse effects in algal growth inhibition tests, which must be taken into account in hazard assessment of plastic litter.
Sign in to start a discussion.
More Papers Like This
Algal Growth at Environmentally Relevant Concentrations of Suspended Solids: Implications for Microplastic Hazard Assessment
Researchers compared growth inhibition in the unicellular alga Raphidocelis subcapitata exposed to microplastics alongside natural particulate matter (kaolin and cellulose) at environmentally relevant concentrations (10-1000 mg/L). They found that all suspended solids, including natural materials, caused growth inhibition at higher concentrations, highlighting the need for reference particulate materials in microplastic hazard assessments to distinguish plastic-specific from generic physical effects.
What is particular about microplastics? A meta-analysis of the toxicity of microplastics and suspended sediments
This meta-analysis pools data from multiple studies to compare the toxicity of microplastics with natural suspended sediment particles in aquatic environments. The results help determine whether microplastics are uniquely harmful or behave similarly to other particles that organisms naturally encounter. This distinction matters for setting science-based pollution limits and understanding actual health risks.
Ecotoxicological assessment of suspended solids: The importance of biofilm and particle aggregation
Researchers used Daphnia magna toxicity assays to disentangle the effects of microplastics versus natural particles and biofilm, finding that biofilm presence and high total suspended solid concentrations drove mortality more than microplastic proportion alone.
Microplastics could be marginally more hazardous than natural suspended solids – A meta-analysis
Species sensitivity distributions constructed from harmonized toxicity data suggest microplastics may be marginally more hazardous to aquatic organisms than natural suspended sediments, though high uncertainty prevents definitive conclusions. The lack of comparable experimental studies and dose-dependent data was a major limitation.
Effects of microplastics and natural particles on the aquatic invertebrate Daphnia magna under different dietary quality scenarios
Researchers exposed Daphnia magna to both natural particles—including sediment, algae, and biofilm—and polystyrene microplastics to compare their effects, finding that natural particles caused similar or greater harm than microplastics at equivalent concentrations, highlighting the need for environmental context in MP toxicity studies.