Article
?
AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button.
Tier 2
?
Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence.
Detection Methods
Environmental Sources
Sign in to save
Microplastic Fallout in Different Indoor Environments
Environmental Science & Technology2020
404 citations
?
Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Score: 50
?
0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Researchers tracked microplastic fallout in indoor environments (dormitory, office, corridor) over three months and found that higher human activity on workdays and airflow from air conditioning increased microplastic deposition rates, identifying indoor air as a significant exposure route.
Microplastics in the air have gradually attracted our attention in recent years; however, temporal and spatial trends of microplastics in indoor air are rarely discussed. In the present study, we tracked microplastic fallout in a dormitory, an office, and a corridor on both workdays and weekends for three months. In addition, an air conditioner was used to understand airflow influence on microplastic resuspension in the dorm. Among the three sampling sites, the highest average microplastic abundance appeared in the dormitory (9.9 × 10<sup>3</sup> MPs/m<sup>2</sup>/d), followed by the office (1.8 × 10<sup>3</sup> MPs/m<sup>2</sup>/d) and the corridor (1.5 × 10<sup>3</sup> MPs/m<sup>2</sup>/d). In the dormitory, the average MP abundance on weekends (1.4 × 10<sup>4</sup> MPs/m<sup>2</sup>/d) was approximately three times of that on weekdays (5.8 × 10<sup>3</sup> MPs/m<sup>2</sup>/d). In the office; however, the abundance on weekends (1.2 × 10<sup>3</sup> MPs/m<sup>2</sup>/d) was 50% of that on weekdays (2.4 × 10<sup>3</sup> MPs/m<sup>2</sup>/d). Microplastic fallout existed mostly in the form of fibers and showed similar polymer compositions to the textile products used in indoor environments. The airflow tests using an air conditioner suggested that airflow turbulence increased resuspension of microplastics. Taken together, we conclude that indoor environments are prone to serious microplastic pollution, but microplastic level varies greatly due to different characteristics of indoor setting. Our results also indicate that textile quantity is one of the main factors affecting microplastic abundance in indoor air, whereas air conditioner-induced airflow turbulence can cause microplastic migration in indoor environments.