0
Article Tier 2 Detection Methods Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Reporting Guidelines to Increase the Reproducibility and Comparability of Research on Microplastics

Applied Spectroscopy 2020 384 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

A group of 23 researchers developed standardized reporting guidelines to improve the reproducibility and comparability of microplastic studies across different laboratories and settings. They created a detailed checklist covering best practices for materials, sampling, sample preparation, identification, and quantification of microplastics. The guidelines aim to address a major bottleneck in the field where inconsistent methods have made it difficult to compare findings or conduct reliable large-scale analyses.

The ubiquitous pollution of the environment with microplastics, a diverse suite of contaminants, is of growing concern for science and currently receives considerable public, political, and academic attention. The potential impact of microplastics in the environment has prompted a great deal of research in recent years. Many diverse methods have been developed to answer different questions about microplastic pollution, from sources, transport, and fate in the environment, and about effects on humans and wildlife. These methods are often insufficiently described, making studies neither comparable nor reproducible. The proliferation of new microplastic investigations and cross-study syntheses to answer larger scale questions are hampered. This diverse group of 23 researchers think these issues can begin to be overcome through the adoption of a set of reporting guidelines. This collaboration was created using an open science framework that we detail for future use. Here, we suggest harmonized reporting guidelines for microplastic studies in environmental and laboratory settings through all steps of a typical study, including best practices for reporting materials, quality assurance/quality control, data, field sampling, sample preparation, microplastic identification, microplastic categorization, microplastic quantification, and considerations for toxicology studies. We developed three easy to use documents, a detailed document, a checklist, and a mind map, that can be used to reference the reporting guidelines quickly. We intend that these reporting guidelines support the annotation, dissemination, interpretation, reviewing, and synthesis of microplastic research. Through open access licensing (CC BY 4.0), these documents aim to increase the validity, reproducibility, and comparability of studies in this field for the benefit of the global community.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

sj-pdf-1-asp-10.1177_0003702820930292 - Supplemental material for Reporting Guidelines to Increase the Reproducibility and Comparability of Research on Microplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

This is supplemental material for a published study on reporting guidelines to improve reproducibility and comparability of microplastic research. The document provides additional methodological details and checklists supporting the main reporting guidelines article. This is supporting documentation rather than a standalone research study.

Article Tier 2

sj-pdf-2-asp-10.1177_0003702820930292 - Supplemental material for Reporting Guidelines to Increase the Reproducibility and Comparability of Research on Microplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

This is supplemental material accompanying a published study developing reporting guidelines to improve the reproducibility and comparability of microplastic research, providing additional methodological details and checklists for Applied Spectroscopy. The supplementary document supports the main guidelines article. This is a supporting data file rather than a standalone research article.

Article Tier 2

Reporting Marine Microplastics Data: the Need for a Standardized Protocol

AI summary Read the abstract

This paper argues for standardized protocols for reporting marine microplastic data, noting that inconsistent methods across studies make it impossible to compare results or track pollution trends globally. The authors reviewed existing guidelines and proposed a minimum set of variables that should be reported in all marine microplastic studies. Standardization is urgently needed to enable policy-relevant monitoring of ocean plastic contamination.

Article Tier 2

A field and laboratory manual for sampling, processing and reporting microplastics in coastal and marine environments

AI summary Read the abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive, standardized field and laboratory guideline for sampling, processing, and reporting microplastics in coastal and marine environments, developed through international collaboration. The harmonized protocols aim to improve comparability of data across global monitoring programmes.

Article Tier 2

Quantification of microplastics: Which parameters are essential for a reliable inter-study comparison?

AI summary Read the abstract

Inconsistent measurement methods make it very difficult to compare microplastic data across studies. This paper proposes standardized guidelines for quantifying microplastic size and shape distributions, which would allow scientists to better track pollution levels over time and across locations.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper