0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Reporting Guidelines to Increase the Reproducibility and Comparability of Research on Microplastics

Applied Spectroscopy 2020 384 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Win Cowger, Andy M. Booth, Bonnie M. Hamilton, Clara Thaysen, Sebastian Primpke, Keenan Munno, Amy Lusher, Alexandre Dehaut, Vitor Pereira Vaz, Max Liboiron, Lisa Devriese, Ludovic Hermabessière, Chelsea M. Rochman, Samantha N. Athey, Jennifer M. Lynch, Hannah De Frond, Andrew B. Gray, Oliver A.H. Jones, Susanne M. Brander, Clare Steele, Shelly Moore, Alterra Sanchez, Holly Nel

Summary

A group of 23 researchers developed standardized reporting guidelines to improve the reproducibility and comparability of microplastic studies across different laboratories and settings. They created a detailed checklist covering best practices for materials, sampling, sample preparation, identification, and quantification of microplastics. The guidelines aim to address a major bottleneck in the field where inconsistent methods have made it difficult to compare findings or conduct reliable large-scale analyses.

The ubiquitous pollution of the environment with microplastics, a diverse suite of contaminants, is of growing concern for science and currently receives considerable public, political, and academic attention. The potential impact of microplastics in the environment has prompted a great deal of research in recent years. Many diverse methods have been developed to answer different questions about microplastic pollution, from sources, transport, and fate in the environment, and about effects on humans and wildlife. These methods are often insufficiently described, making studies neither comparable nor reproducible. The proliferation of new microplastic investigations and cross-study syntheses to answer larger scale questions are hampered. This diverse group of 23 researchers think these issues can begin to be overcome through the adoption of a set of reporting guidelines. This collaboration was created using an open science framework that we detail for future use. Here, we suggest harmonized reporting guidelines for microplastic studies in environmental and laboratory settings through all steps of a typical study, including best practices for reporting materials, quality assurance/quality control, data, field sampling, sample preparation, microplastic identification, microplastic categorization, microplastic quantification, and considerations for toxicology studies. We developed three easy to use documents, a detailed document, a checklist, and a mind map, that can be used to reference the reporting guidelines quickly. We intend that these reporting guidelines support the annotation, dissemination, interpretation, reviewing, and synthesis of microplastic research. Through open access licensing (CC BY 4.0), these documents aim to increase the validity, reproducibility, and comparability of studies in this field for the benefit of the global community.

Share this paper