Same but different: A framework to design and compare riverbank plastic monitoring strategies
2020
18 citations
?
Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count.
Score: 40
?
0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Tim van Emmerik
Paul Vriend,
Paul Vriend,
Paul Vriend,
Paul Vriend,
Paul Vriend,
Paul Vriend,
Paul Vriend,
Paul Vriend,
Caspar T. J. Roebroek,
Caspar T. J. Roebroek,
Caspar T. J. Roebroek,
Caspar T. J. Roebroek,
Caspar T. J. Roebroek,
Caspar T. J. Roebroek,
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Caspar T. J. Roebroek,
Caspar T. J. Roebroek,
Caspar T. J. Roebroek,
Paul Vriend,
Paul Vriend,
Paul Vriend,
Paul Vriend,
Paul Vriend,
Paul Vriend,
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Paul Vriend,
Paul Vriend,
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Paul Vriend,
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Paul Vriend,
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Paul Vriend,
Tim van Emmerik
Paul Vriend,
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Paul Vriend,
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Tim van Emmerik
Summary
Researchers proposed a standardized framework for designing and comparing riverbank plastic monitoring strategies, identifying four common elements shared across existing methods to facilitate harmonization of data collection. The framework aims to help scientists and practitioners balance research objectives against available resources, improving cross-study comparability of macroplastic litter data.
Plastic pollution in rivers negatively impacts human livelihood and aquatic ecosystems. Monitoring data are crucial for a better understanding of sources, sinks and transport mechanisms of riverine macroplastics. In turn, such understanding is key to develop effective plastic pollution prevention, mitigation and removal strategies. Riverine plastic has been observed in all compartments, of which floating macroplastic and riverbank plastic are most frequently studied. Existing riverbank plastic measurement methods vary greatly, which complicates direct comparison of data collected with different methods. We present a framework to better compare and to aid the design of riverbank plastic monitoring methods, which is based on four common elements distilled from riverbank (plastic) litter monitoring methods currently in use. This framework can be used by scientists and practitioners to find the right trade-offs between the data required to answer specific research questions, and the available resources. With this paper, we aim to provide a first step towards harmonization of riverbank (plastic) litter monitoring efforts.