0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Remediation Sign in to save

A comparative environmental life cycle assessment of hatchery, cultivation, and preservation of the kelp<i>Saccharina latissima</i>

ICES Journal of Marine Science 2020 65 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Jean-Baptiste Thomas, Jean-Baptiste Thomas, Fredrïk Gröndahl Mauricio Sodré Ribeiro, Mauricio Sodré Ribeiro, José Potting, Ingrid Undeland, Gunnar Cervin, Jean-Baptiste Thomas, Göran M. Nylund, Johanna Olsson, Eva Albers, Fredrïk Gröndahl Ingrid Undeland, Henrik Pavia, Fredrïk Gröndahl

Summary

Researchers conducted a comparative environmental life cycle assessment of hatchery, cultivation, and preservation stages for the brown seaweed Saccharina latissima at a pilot facility in Sweden, accounting for nutrient bioremediation and carbon capture benefits. The study evaluated the environmental sustainability profile of seaweed cultivation as part of potential contributions to the circular bioeconomy.

Abstract Seaweed cultivation and processing industries could contribute to sustainable blue growth and the European bioeconomy. This article contributes a case study evaluation of environmental sustainability of preserved brown seaweed Saccharina latissima by means of environmental life cycle assessment of a pilot facility in Sweden. The study accounts for nutrient bioremediation and carbon capture and includes two alternative hatchery processes, a 2-ha longline cultivation, and four alternative preservation methods (hang-drying outdoors, heated air-cabinet drying, ensiling, and freezing). The study found that as a result of carbon capture and nitrogen and phosphorus uptake (bioremediation) by seaweed, more CO2 and PO4 equivalents are (temporarily) absorbed than emitted by the supply chain. The extent of emissions is most affected by preservation methods undertaken. Impact profiles of the supply chain show that the greatest impact shares result from freezing and air-cabinet drying, both the two most energy-intensive processes, followed by the cultivation infrastructure, highlighting strategic optimization opportunities. Hatchery processes, harvesting, and the low-energy ensilage and hang-drying outdoors were found to have relatively small impact shares. These findings presage the environmentally friendliness of seaweed-based products by documenting their potential to mitigate eutrophication and climate change, even when taking a life cycle perspective.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper