0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Occurrence of phthalate esters and microplastics in urban secondary effluents, receiving water bodies and reclaimed water treatment processes

The Science of The Total Environment 2020 70 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Yuan Liu Yuan Liu Rumeng Wang, Yuan Liu Yuan Liu Yuan Liu Rumeng Wang, Min Ji, Hongyan Zhai, Min Ji, Hongyan Zhai, Yuan Liu Yuan Liu Yuan Liu Yuan Liu Yuan Liu Min Ji, Yuan Liu Min Ji, Hongyan Zhai, Hongyan Zhai, Hongyan Zhai, Hongyan Zhai, Min Ji, Hongyan Zhai, Hongyan Zhai, Min Ji, Yuan Liu

Summary

Researchers simultaneously investigated phthalate ester and microplastic occurrence in four wastewater treatment plants, receiving water bodies, and reclaimed water treatment processes across winter and spring seasons, detecting four phthalate types at total concentrations of 568.9 to over 1,800 ng/L. The study found that both contaminant classes persisted through treatment processes and were discharged into receiving water bodies.

Study Type Environmental

The occurrence of phthalate esters (PAEs) and microplastics (MPs) was simultaneously investigated in four wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), receiving water bodies and reclaimed water treatment processes (RWTPs) in winter and spring. Four PAEs (dimethyl phthalate, dibutyl phthalate, diisobutyl phthalate, and di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate) were detected. The total concentrations of PAEs were 568.9-1847.5 ng/L in the four WWTP effluents and 39.9-1847.5 ng/L in the four receiving water bodies. Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate had the highest concentration among the PAEs. MPs were mostly in the form of granules and fragments with size <0.01 mm in the four WWTP effluents (276-1030 items/L) and receiving water bodies (103-4458 items/L). The four WWTP effluents were important sources of PAEs to the receiving water bodies in spring but were not likely to be the sources of MPs. The overall removal rates of PAEs and MPs were 47.7%-81.6% and 63.5%-95.4% in the four RWTPs. Low or negative removal rates of PAEs were observed in chlorination and ozonation. Clarification, filtration (except ultrafiltration) and reverse osmosis were the dominant processes, contributing 42.7%-69.2%, 25.3%-59.3%, and 22.6%-51.0%, respectively, of the MP removal in the RWTPs. According to the Spearman analysis results, the levels of PAEs and MPs had more significant correlations with the physicochemical parameters of water samples from the RWTPs (including the WWTP effluents) than those of the receiving water bodies. The results indicated that the levels of PAEs and MPs in surface waters could be significantly influenced by the surrounding environment.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper