We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Effect of Ion Irradiation Introduced by Focused Ion-Beam Milling on the Mechanical Behaviour of Sub-Micron-Sized Samples
Summary
Researchers compared two methods of cutting ultra-small metal samples for microscopy using different ion beams (xenon vs. gallium), finding that xenon plasma systems remove material faster and cause less structural damage — improving the accuracy of nanoscale materials testing.
The development of xenon plasma focused ion-beam (Xe<sup>+</sup> PFIB) milling technique enables site-specific sample preparation with milling rates several times larger than the conventional gallium focused ion-beam (Ga<sup>+</sup> FIB) technique. As such, the effect of higher beam currents and the heavier ions utilized in the Xe<sup>+</sup> PFIB system is of particular importance when investigating material properties. To investigate potential artifacts resulting from these new parameters, a comparative study is performed on transmission electron microscopy (TEM) samples prepared via Xe<sup>+</sup> PFIB and Ga<sup>+</sup> FIB systems. Utilizing samples prepared with each system, the mechanical properties of CrMnFeCoNi high-entropy alloy (HEA) samples are evaluated with in situ tensile straining TEM studies. The results show that HEA samples prepared by Xe<sup>+</sup> PFIB present better ductility but lower strength than those prepared by Ga<sup>+</sup> FIB. This is due to the small ion-irradiated volumes and the insignificant alloying effect brought by Xe irradiation. Overall, these results demonstrate that Xe<sup>+</sup> PFIB systems allow for a more efficient material removal rate while imparting less damage to HEAs than conventional Ga<sup>+</sup> FIB systems.
Sign in to start a discussion.