0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Sign in to save

Environmental hazard testing of nanobiomaterials

Environmental Sciences Europe 2020 22 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Mónica J.B. Amorim, María Luisa Fernández‐Cruz, Kerstin Hund‐Rinke, Janeck J. Scott‐Fordsmand

Summary

Researchers reviewed the challenges of testing whether nanobiomaterials — tiny biological or biomimetic particles used in medicine — pose risks to the environment after being released from patients, finding that existing regulatory guidelines designed for conventional chemicals are poorly suited to these novel materials. The paper proposes updates to international OECD testing standards to better capture the unique behavior and hazards of nanoscale biological materials in ecosystems.

Abstract The European Medicines Agency (EMA) regards the potential risks of human medicinal products to the environment and their impacts are assessed, as well as management to limit this impact. Hazard assessment of novel materials, which differ from conventional chemicals, e.g. nanobiomaterials, poses testing challenges and represents a work-in-progress with much focus on the optimization of required methodologies. For this work-in-progress, we here highlight where changes/updates are required in relation to the main elements for international testing based on OECD guidelines, supported by knowledge from the nanotoxicity area. The outline describes two major sections, nanobiomaterials and environmental hazards, including its challenges and learned lessons, with recommendations for implementation in OECD guidelines. Finally, the way forward via a testing strategy is described.

Sign in to start a discussion.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Practical considerations to optimize aquatic testing of particulate material, with focus on nanomaterials

This paper discusses the practical challenges researchers face when applying existing OECD test guidelines to aquatic toxicity testing of particulate materials including nanomaterials and microplastics. Harmonizing test protocols is essential for generating results that can be meaningfully compared across studies and used to inform regulatory risk assessments for microplastic pollution.

Article Tier 2

Alternative test methods for (nano)materials hazards assessment: Challenges and recommendations for regulatory preparedness

This review assessed the state of alternative testing methods — including in vitro cell models, omics approaches, and computational tools — for evaluating hazards of nanomaterials, identifying gaps relative to existing OECD guidelines and recommending priority areas for regulatory adoption.

Article Tier 2

Current hurdles to the translation of nanomedicines from bench to the clinic

This review examines the challenges of translating nanomedicine research from the lab to approved medical treatments, focusing on regulatory hurdles and manufacturing consistency. While not directly about microplastics, the review is relevant because the same nanoparticle characterization methods and safety testing frameworks apply to understanding how nanoplastics behave in the human body. Lessons from nanomedicine development can help researchers better assess the health risks of nanoplastic exposure.

Article Tier 2

Solving Familiar Problems: Leveraging Environmental Testing Methods for Nanomaterials to Evaluate Microplastics and Nanoplastics

This paper argues that existing environmental testing frameworks developed for nanomaterials can be adapted to evaluate the risks of microplastics and nanoplastics, rather than building entirely new regulatory approaches from scratch. The authors outline how standard ecotoxicological methods could be leveraged to more efficiently characterize plastic particle hazards.

Article Tier 2

Too advanced for assessment? Advanced materials, nanomedicine and the environment

Researchers argue that while advanced nanomaterials — including the nanoparticle-based COVID-19 vaccines — offer major health benefits, almost nothing is known about what happens to these materials after they pass through the human body and enter the environment. Closing this gap requires new environmental testing methods and regulatory frameworks that treat human health and ecological safety as connected, not separate.

Share this paper