0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Corridors of Clarity: Four Principles to Overcome Uncertainty Paralysis in the Anthropocene

BioScience 2020 23 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Stephen Polasky, Paul R. Ehrlich, Anne‐Sophie Crépin, Reinette Biggs, Reinette Biggs, Marten Scheffer, Carl Folke, Simon A. Levin, Stephen R. Carpenter, Carl Folke, Garry Peterson, Marten Scheffer, Scott Barrett, Gretchen C. Daily, Paul R. Ehrlich, Richard B. Howarth, Terry P. Hughes, Simon A. Levin, Jason F. Shogren, Max Troell Brian Walker, Anastasios Xepapadeas, Max Troell Max Troell

Summary

This conceptual paper proposed four principles for overcoming 'uncertainty paralysis' in environmental decision-making during the Anthropocene, arguing that scientists and policymakers can act effectively on global environmental change by clarifying the nature of uncertainty, separating knowable from unknowable risks, and using adaptive management frameworks.

Global environmental change challenges humanity because of its broad scale, long-lasting, and potentially irreversible consequences. Key to an effective response is to use an appropriate scientific lens to peer through the mist of uncertainty that threatens timely and appropriate decisions surrounding these complex issues. Identifying such corridors of clarity could help understanding critical phenomena or causal pathways sufficiently well to justify taking policy action. To this end, we suggest four principles: Follow the strongest and most direct path between policy decisions on outcomes, focus on finding sufficient evidence for policy purpose, prioritize no-regrets policies by avoiding options with controversial, uncertain, or immeasurable benefits, aim for getting the big picture roughly right rather than focusing on details.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper