0
Article Tier 2 Nanoplastics Sign in to save

A brief concept on the physical remediation of microplastics and nanoplastics from water environment

Environmental Technology Reviews 2025 3 citations

AI summary Read the abstract

Tiny plastic particles called microplastics and nanoplastics are showing up in our water supplies, and this review paper rounds up the science on how well different filtering and separation methods can remove them, finding that techniques like advanced filtration and combined treatment systems can strip out over 90-95% of larger microplastics, though the even tinier nanoplastics are much harder to catch. This matters because these plastic particles can end up in our drinking water and bodies, and knowing which cleanup methods actually work (and which ones create new problems, like leftover sludge or high energy use) helps guide better water treatment for public health.

The harmful effects of microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs) on aquatic ecosystems, which negatively impact human health, have raised considerable concerns about these contaminants in many water bodies. Their small size and distributed nature make them difficult to remove from the water. Filtration, coagulation and flocculation, and centrifugation are a few examples of physical remediation techniques that have drawn interest for their ability to handle the task. This review summarizes that physical remediations like advanced filtration, coagulation-flocculation, centrifugation, magnetic separation, ultrasonication, and electrostatic separation can achieve high removal rates for MPs and, to a lesser extent, NPs. The performance of these methods is influenced by particle size, shape, and polymer type, as well as by operational conditions and water matrix complexity. Membrane fouling and clogging reduce efficiency and increase maintenance costs. Coagulation generates sludge that must be safely managed. High-energy processes like ultrasonication contribute to carbon footprints. Conventional techniques have proven large-scale applicability, with removal efficiencies often exceeding 90%, while hybrid systems can push removal beyond 95% for MPs. NPs remain more challenging to capture, requiring process optimization, targeted pre-treatment, materials recovery, advancing hybrid treatment designs, minimizing operational costs, and integrating renewable energy sources.

More Papers Like This

Article Tier 2

Microplastics Remediation in the Aqueous Environment

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers reviewed physical, chemical, and biological remediation strategies for removing microplastics from aquatic environments, assessing the strengths and limitations of each approach and identifying the most promising technologies for large-scale environmental decontamination.

Article Tier 2

An Overview of Physical, Chemical and Biological Methods for Removal of Microplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

Physical, chemical, and biological methods each offer distinct tradeoffs for removing microplastics from water resources, with no single approach achieving complete removal across all particle sizes and polymer types. Advancing these treatment technologies is essential to protecting drinking water supplies and reducing the biological uptake of microplastics in humans and wildlife.

Article Tier 2

Microplastics in aquatic environment: fate, human exposure, removal and advances of nanotechnology in remediation

AI summary Read the abstract

This review traces microplastic pathways from aquatic sources — including seafood, drinking water, and sea salt — through the human food chain, estimating up to 26,250 microplastic particles ingested per person annually from seafood alone, while also cataloging the toxic additives and co-transported heavy metals these particles carry. It evaluates physical, chemical, and biological removal methods before identifying nanotechnology-based approaches as the most promising next generation of water treatment for microplastic elimination.

Article Tier 2

Nanoparticle in Removal of Microplastics

AI summary Read the abstract

Scientists found that tiny particles made of nickel can soak up microplastics from water, removing up to 83% of them in lab tests. This matters because microplastics are showing up in our drinking water, food, and even our bodies, and this cheap, eco-friendly method could one day help water treatment plants filter them out before they reach our taps. That said, this is early-stage lab research, so more testing is needed before it becomes a real-world solution.

Article Tier 2

Microplastic and Nanoplastic Removal Efficiency with Current and Innovative Water Technologies

AI summary Read the abstract

Researchers compared conventional and innovative water treatment technologies for their effectiveness at removing microplastics and nanoplastics from drinking and wastewater. The review identifies critical gaps in current infrastructure and highlights advanced filtration and coagulation approaches that show the greatest removal efficiency.

Research digests by email

When a large batch of papers lands in the Atlas, we read through it and send a short write-up of what stood out.

Email me about

Share this paper