0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Detection Methods Environmental Sources Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Remediation Sign in to save

Toward Balancing the Budget: Surface Macro-Plastics Dominate the Mass of Particulate Pollution Stranded on Beaches

Frontiers in Marine Science 2020 70 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 40 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Peter G. Ryan Eleanor A. Weideman, Peter G. Ryan Eleanor A. Weideman, Eleanor A. Weideman, Peter G. Ryan Peter G. Ryan Peter G. Ryan Peter G. Ryan Eleanor A. Weideman, Peter G. Ryan Coleen L. Moloney, Vonica Perold, Eleanor A. Weideman, Vonica Perold, Vonica Perold, Peter G. Ryan Peter G. Ryan Eleanor A. Weideman, Vonica Perold, Peter G. Ryan Peter G. Ryan Peter G. Ryan Peter G. Ryan Vonica Perold, Vonica Perold, Vonica Perold, Vonica Perold, Vonica Perold, Vonica Perold, Eleanor A. Weideman, Peter G. Ryan Coleen L. Moloney, Coleen L. Moloney, Peter G. Ryan Peter G. Ryan Peter G. Ryan Peter G. Ryan Peter G. Ryan Peter G. Ryan Peter G. Ryan Peter G. Ryan Peter G. Ryan Peter G. Ryan Peter G. Ryan Peter G. Ryan Peter G. Ryan Peter G. Ryan

Summary

Researchers found that surface macroplastics dominate beach plastic pollution by mass on a remote South African beach, even though microfibres accounted for 99.7% of items by count. The study revealed that buried litter represents 86% of macroplastic items but only 5% of macroplastic mass, and ongoing degradation of existing plastic will increase fragment counts even without new plastic inputs.

Study Type Environmental

Most studies report the abundance of plastic items in the environment, but mass is an equally important currency for monitoring plastic pollution, particularly given attempts to balance the global plastic budget. We determined the size/mass composition of litter stranded on a remote, infrequently-cleaned sandy beach on the west coast of South Africa. Traditional surveys of superficial macrolitter were augmented by sieved transects for buried macrolitter (8-mm mesh), mesolitter (2-mm mesh) and sediment cores for microlitter. Aggregating the data across all sampling scales, the total density was ~1.9x10^5 anthropogenic particulate pollutants per linear metre of beach, 99.7% of which were microfibres (most of which are likely not ‘plastic’). Plastics comprised 99.6% of beach macro- and mesolitter by number and 89% by mass. Small items dominated samples numerically, but were trivial relative to larger items in terms of their mass. Buried litter accounted for 86% of macroplastic items, but only 5% of the mass of macroplastics, because smaller items are buried more easily than large items. The total density of plastic (~1.2 kg·m–1), at least half of which was from fisheries and shipping, is much lower than predicted by global models of plastic leakage from land-based sources. Ongoing degradation of plastic items already in the environment, particularly on beaches, is likely to result in a marked increase in plastic fragments, even if we stop leaking additional plastic. The collection of large items from beaches is a useful stop-gap measure to limit the formation of microplastics while we formulate effective steps to prevent plastic leakage into the environment.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper