0
Article ? AI-assigned paper type based on the abstract. Classification may not be perfect — flag errors using the feedback button. Tier 2 ? Original research — experimental, observational, or case-control study. Direct primary evidence. Environmental Sources Human Health Effects Marine & Wildlife Policy & Risk Sign in to save

Development and Deployment of a Framework to Prioritize Environmental Contamination Issues

Sustainability 2020 5 citations ? Citation count from OpenAlex, updated daily. May differ slightly from the publisher's own count. Score: 30 ? 0–100 AI score estimating relevance to the microplastics field. Papers below 30 are filtered from public browse.
Nicholas Kim, Louis A. Tremblay Matthew D. Taylor, Louis A. Tremblay Louis A. Tremblay Louis A. Tremblay Louis A. Tremblay Louis A. Tremblay Olivier Champeau, Jonathan Caldwell, Jonathan Caldwell, Olivier Champeau, Andrew Rumsby, Louis A. Tremblay Andrew Rumsby, Louis A. Tremblay Louis A. Tremblay Olivier Champeau, Louis A. Tremblay Louis A. Tremblay Louis A. Tremblay Louis A. Tremblay Louis A. Tremblay

Summary

This study developed a nine-factor ranking model to help regulatory agencies prioritize which environmental contamination issues deserve the most research and policy attention. It is a policy prioritization framework not directly focused on microplastics, though plastic contamination is among the issues it can evaluate.

Study Type Environmental

Management and regulatory agencies face a wide range of environmental issues globally. The challenge is to identify and select the issues to assist the allocation of research and policy resources to achieve maximum environmental gain. A framework was developed to prioritize environmental contamination issues in a sustainable management policy context using a nine-factor ranking model to rank the significance of diffuse sources of stressors. It focuses on contamination issues that involve large geographic scales (e.g., all pastoral soils), significant population exposures (e.g., urban air quality), and multiple outputs from same source on receiving environmental compartments comprising air, surface water, groundwater, and sediment. Factor scores are allocated using a scoring scale and weighted following defined rules. Results are ranked enabling the rational comparison of dissimilar and complex issues. Advantages of this model include flexibility, transparency, ability to prioritize new issues as they arise, and ability to identify which issues are comparatively trivial and which present a more serious challenge to sustainability policy goals. This model integrates well as a planning tool and has been used to inform regional policy development.

Sign in to start a discussion.

Share this paper